Skip to main content

The Rainfall Every Hundred Years

RainfallEarlier this year, the Fort Calhoun nuclear facility in Nebraska was surrounded by the Missouri River, which jumped its banks due to a strong winter runoff and heavy spring rains. That flood was characterized as a 100-year event. 

Is a 100-year event like the cicadas that swarm the Washington area every 17 years? No, not at all. The cicadas arrive on a predictable schedule. Seventeen years elapse and there they are again.

This is a better description of a 100-year event:

Of course, return period doesn’t mean that we won’t see that kind of rain in those locations for several decades (or centuries). A 1 in 100 year rain means that there is a 1% chance of seeing that amount of rain in any given year. A 0.1% chance is true for a 1 in 1000 year event.

I assume that the 1 in 100 number changes every time something similar takes place – obviously, the odds of it happening in a given year drop if it happens more frequently. In any event, what is being discussed here is the rainfall in the Washington area last week.

On Thursday, September 8, Ft. Belvoir [in Virginia] received an astounding 7.03” of rain in three hours. According to the National Weather Service (NWS), that amount of rain in that amount of time was an “off the charts above a 1000-year rainfall (based on precip frequency from Quantico).”

The rain every thousand years – good title for a novel. There’s more (a bit edited – see the link for more):

  • The Bowie IFLOWS gauge recorded 4.57 inches in 3 hours, which is about a 200-year rainfall.
  • For Upper Marlboro and near Ellicott City, Wednesday’s rains were a roughly one in 50-100 year event.
  • For Westview , Wednesday’s rains were a roughly one in 10-25 year event.
  • The Kingstowne IFLOWS gauge in Fairfax County recorded 5.47 inches in 3 hours, which is approximately a 500-year rainfall for that timeframe.
  • The Reston IFLOWS gauge in Fairfax County recorded 6.57 inches in 6 hours, which is also approximately a 500-year rainfall.

These places are all in Virginia and Maryland.

One might be tempted to ask: Global warming?

Although the ties between climate change and extreme weather events often elicit absolute statements from advocates on various sides of the climate change issue, the reality is that while much can be said, much remains unknown. The challenge for reporters as well as scientists is to accurately convey both the scientific findings and the uncertainties surrounding them.

So perhaps, perhaps not. But:

The physical mechanism behind the link between warming global average land and ocean temperatures and more frequent heavy precipitation events is rather simple to understand - as air warms, it can hold more water vapor, which means that more water can then be squeezed out of the atmosphere as liquid or frozen precipitation.

So, um,maybe more perhaps – in intensity if not frequency – so it may be that a strong rainfall previously thought a 100 year event becomes a 50 year event because the intensity of rainfall generally increases. Or the floods along the Missouri become at least somewhat more frequent. (Tornadoes need not apply – different dynamics.)

A report published by the Bush administration in 2008 (based in part on the work of the U.N. IPCC, but focusing specifically on North America) had already concluded that human activities are associated with changing characteristics of certain kinds of extreme weather events, and the evidence keeps on accumulating.

And keeps on accumulating. The world has not stopped working on this issue, and the United States – industry and government and plain old folks – are still working on mitigating the effects of climate change. While there are countervailing forces, certainly, there is also a strong forward momentum.

Nuclear energy has different parts to play in different issues, but it plays its part in this one just by existing and expanding its share of U.S. electricity generation – if not quite yet, soon. So do solar, wind, hydro and other energy sources.

In the meantime, the river will rise and the rain will fall.


It doesn't affect the article, but it is worth noting what the weather bureau means when they talk about a 1000 year rainfall, or for that matter when they say that there is a 50% chance of rain tomorrow.

Weather forecasts, including those of extremes, cover areas, not a single geographic point. So on average there will be one thousand year rainfall event per year, per every thousand locations covered. Similarly if the weather forecast for your area is a 50% chance of rain tomorrow, the expectation is that half the area buildings will get rained on. (Those people who move around a lot will tend to get rained on part of the time.)

Are there more than one thousand areas in the US that will have significantly different weather over the course of a year? Probably, although a lot of them will be in Alaska. So a couple of extreme (local) weather events per year are not surprising.

Popular posts from this blog

Making Clouds for a Living

Donell Banks works at Southern Nuclear’s Plant Vogtle units 3 and 4 as a shift supervisor in Operations, but is in the process of transitioning to his newly appointed role as the daily work controls manager. He has been in the nuclear energy industry for about 11 years.

I love what I do because I have the unique opportunity to help shape the direction and influence the culture for the future of nuclear power in the United States. Every single day presents a new challenge, but I wouldn't have it any other way. As a shift supervisor, I was primarily responsible for managing the development of procedures and programs to support operation of the first new nuclear units in the United States in more than 30 years. As the daily work controls manager, I will be responsible for oversight of the execution and scheduling of daily work to ensure organizational readiness to operate the new units.

I envision a nuclear energy industry that leverages the technology of today to improve efficiency…

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear: Energy for All Political Seasons

The electoral college will soon confirm a surprise election result, Donald Trump. However, in the electricity world, there are fewer surprises – physics and economics will continue to apply, and Republicans and Democrats are going to find a lot to like about nuclear energy over the next four years.

In a Trump administration, the carbon conversation is going to be less prominent. But the nuclear value proposition is still there. We bring steady jobs to rural areas, including in the Rust Belt, which put Donald Trump in office. Nuclear plants keep the surrounding communities vibrant.

We hold down electricity costs for the whole economy. We provide energy diversity, reducing the risk of disruption. We are a critical part of America’s industrial infrastructure, and the importance of infrastructure is something that President-Elect Trump has stressed.

One of our infrastructure challenges is natural gas pipelines, which have gotten more congested as extremely low gas prices have pulled m…