Skip to main content

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site:

TEPCO to Build Iron Wall to Contain Radioactive Water

Plant Status

• Tokyo Electric Power Co. plans to build an “iron wall” between the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear energy facility and the ocean to keep radioactive water out of the sea. Thousands of 24-yard-long iron pipes will be sunk into the earth, extending to below the sea bed, to create a wall around the water intakes for reactors 1-4. Construction of the 875-yard wall is expected to begin by the end of the year and be complete in about two years.

Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues

• The Japan Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Ministry has been conducting experiments since May on reducing radiation levels in rice fields near Fukushima Daiichi. In one test, workers have scraped contaminated topsoil from dry paddies. In another, soil has been stirred in water-filled paddies and then removed. Both methods have reduced radiation levels to below government safety levels.

New Products

• New talking points summarize key topics from NEI’s comment letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on proposed near-term actions at U.S. reactors following the Fukushima Daiichi accident. Another set of talking points discusses localized spikes of radiation in areas near the nuclear facility. More talking points address the NRC's approach toward plant seismic studies, which respond to misconstrued media reports on these studies.

Media Highlights

• Tokyo Electric Power Co. will put $30 billion into a new entity established to help the utility compensate individuals and businesses claiming damages caused by the Fukushima Daiichi accident, the Japan Economic Newswire reported. The fund also will receive $91 million from the government and $91 million from 11 other utility companies.

• Japanese citizens are debating the country’s energy future following the accident at Fukushima Daiichi. It is a dilemma for a country that lacks natural resources and has relied heavily on nuclear energy, NPR reports.

Upcoming Events

• A public Sept. 8 NRC Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards meeting will include a review the agency’s near-term task force report on the events at Fukushima.

• The NRC commissioners will be briefed on short-term actions recommended in its Japan task force report in a public meeting Sept. 14. The meeting will be webcast.

• The NRC commissioners will be briefed on prioritization of recommendations from its Japan task force in a public meeting Oct. 11. The briefing will be webcast.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

Why Nuclear Plant Closures Are a Crisis for Small Town USA

Nuclear plants occupy an unusual spot in the towns where they operate: integral but so much in the background that they may seem almost invisible. But when they close, it can be like the earth shifting underfoot.

Lohud.com, the Gannett newspaper that covers the Lower Hudson Valley in New York, took a look around at the experience of towns where reactors have closed, because the Indian Point reactors in Buchanan are scheduled to be shut down under an agreement with Gov. Mario Cuomo.


From sea to shining sea, it was dismal. It wasn’t just the plant employees who were hurt. The losses of hundreds of jobs, tens of millions of dollars in payrolls and millions in property taxes depressed whole towns and surrounding areas. For example:

Vernon, Vermont, home to Vermont Yankee for more than 40 years, had to cut its municipal budget in half. The town closed its police department and let the county take over; the youth sports teams lost their volunteer coaches, and Vernon Elementary School lost th…