Skip to main content

Leak at San Onofre Not Fault of Southern California Edison Says UCS

Overnight, we've seen a lot of breathless coverage about the steam generator leak that happened at San Onfre Generating Station on Tuesday, one that led to a story on the AP's national wire and another during the first segment of ABC's World News Tonight with Diane Sawyer on Wednesday evening.

What happened at San Onofre is a pretty typical operational event. If you don't believe us, feel free to ask David Lochbaum of the Union of Concerned Scientists. Here's what he told one Southern California newspaper about the incident at San Onofre:
The "pinhole"-sized leak in a steam generator tube that caused a partial shutdown at the San Onofre nuclear plant Tuesday is something that is actually to be expected when a plant has new generators like San Onofre does, according to one expert.

San Onofre recently replaced its old generators.

Whenever generators are new or very old, leaks can occur, and engineers know to be alert for the problem, said David Lochbaum, director of the Nuclear Safety Project for the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Lochbaum said that as long as sensors detected the problem and the operators were prepared, "it's not the fault of [owner] Southern California Edison. It just happens" with new generators as they are being broken in.
If you want to know why our nation is having trouble devising a sound energy policy, you should know that the sensational coverage we've seen about San Onofre over the past 48 hours is a part of the reason.

Comments

donb said…
If we had reports like this of steam leaks at the nation's coal-fired power plants, our eyes would quickly glaze over, as this is a rather common occurrance. But since this is at a nuclear plant, it becomes 'big news' as reporters breathlessly comment on the problem.
Gene Stone said…
Releasing steam is one thing, releasing radioactive steam on a regular basis in a population area of over 8.5 million people is quite another. With the EPA rad system turned off and over 50 miles away from San Onofre when it is working, we have no idea of what was released yesterday and for how long. But we do to know the long-term effect of radiation on human beings, it is not good.

France's recent study of clusters of childhood leukemia around each of their nuclear power plants leads us to demand a epidemiology study in our area. It also calls for us to demand the city and county to form a radiation monitoring system of their own to keep the citizens informed. ROSE http://residentsorganizedforasafeenvironment.wordpress.com/
Atomikrabbit said…
From the NRC Licensee Event Report:

"All control rods fully inserted on the trip. Decay heat is being removed thru the main steam bypass valves into the main condenser. Main feedwater is maintaining steam generator level. No relief valves lifted during the manual trip. The plant is in normal shutdown electrical lineup."
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/2012/20120201en.html

I doubt that anything even detectable was released, since they were able to use condenser steam dumps. But since radiation so easily detectable, even in amounts millions of times less than harmful, if even a trace were found they have to acknowledge it, or be called liars by the likes of Gene Stoner.

Meanwhile he blithely posts references to thoroughly refuted “studies” and no one has the cajones to step forward and sue him for libel. Here is the reality: http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS-Low_risk_from_major_accident_consequences-0202127.html
Brian Mays said…
If there's one thing that never fails to amaze me, it is how ridiculously uninformed "anti-nukes" like Gene here are. For example:

"France's recent study of clusters of childhood leukemia around each of their nuclear power plants leads us to demand a epidemiology study in our area."

An epidemiological study of populations near nuclear facilities is already underway and has been for well over a year. The last such large-scale study, conducted by the National Institutes of Health, found no increased risk of cancer for such populations after studying a wide variety of facilities, going back to the 1940's.

As for the French study, this is from the abstract:

"The results suggest a possible excess risk of AL [acute leukemia] in the close vicinity of French NPPs in 2002-2007. The absence of any association with the DBGZ [dose-based geographic zoning] may indicate that the association is not explained by NPP [nuclear power plant] gaseous discharges."

The French study is very weak evidence of anything -- just a couple of statistically significant results, out of many non-significant results reported in the paper, that merit some additional study. That's all.
Anonymous said…
While the leak that caused Unit 3 to shut down has no major safety significance, there is something wrong with the new steam generators at San Onofre.

http://www.ocregister.com/news/unit-338565-reactor-plant.html

Unit 2 is in an outage and the first of the steam generators they are inspecting has over 800 tubes that have more than 10% thinning. Two of the tubes have enough thinning to need to be plugged, and 69 tubes have thinning greater than 20% of the wall thickness. This is an indication that there may have been some significant problems with their feedwater chemistry control in Unit 2, and possibly in Unit 3 too.
Anonymous said…
"...he blithely posts references to thoroughly refuted “studies” and no one has the cajones to step forward and sue him for libel."

Yet another reminder for the constitutionally impaired: Simply posting a reference to a report is not libel. The first amendment is still in effect.

Also, Citizens United notwithstanding, a nuclear power plant is not a person and so can't be libelled. nor can an industry. \

If he claims company X did Y, and they did not, that could be libel. But you just want to sue because you don't like what's being said.
Anonymous said…
And for what it's worth, saying that someone is a "Stoner" (i.e., a marijuana smoker), with no proof (just to make fun of his name), is closer to being libelous than what Gene posted.
Brian Mays said…
"And for what it's worth, saying that someone is a 'Stoner' (i.e., a marijuana smoker), with no proof (just to make fun of his name), is closer to being libelous than what Gene posted."

Sure ... let's put Gene on the stand and have him swear, under oath, that he has never smoked pot. Should be fun!

This seems to me to be much ado over something that is arguably a one-character typo.
John Reynolds said…
Who's going to sue "anonymous" for libel? If you believed in what you were saying, you'd use your real name.
Anonymous said…
"If you believed in what you were saying, you'd use your real name."

My employer wants their name kept out of this stuff, so I'm constrained.

It's not a manhood issue, for crying out loud.

Popular posts from this blog

Sneak Peek

There's an invisible force powering and propelling our way of life.
It's all around us. You can't feel it. Smell it. Or taste it.
But it's there all the same. And if you look close enough, you can see all the amazing and wondrous things it does.
It not only powers our cities and towns.
And all the high-tech things we love.
It gives us the power to invent.
To explore.
To discover.
To create advanced technologies.
This invisible force creates jobs out of thin air.
It adds billions to our economy.
It's on even when we're not.
And stays on no matter what Mother Nature throws at it.
This invisible force takes us to the outer reaches of outer space.
And to the very depths of our oceans.
It brings us together. And it makes us better.
And most importantly, it has the power to do all this in our lifetime while barely leaving a trace.
Some people might say it's kind of unbelievable.
They wonder, what is this new power that does all these extraordinary things?

A Design Team Pictures the Future of Nuclear Energy

For more than 100 years, the shape and location of human settlements has been defined in large part by energy and water. Cities grew up near natural resources like hydropower, and near water for agricultural, industrial and household use.

So what would the world look like with a new generation of small nuclear reactors that could provide abundant, clean energy for electricity, water pumping and desalination and industrial processes?

Hard to say with precision, but Third Way, the non-partisan think tank, asked the design team at the Washington, D.C. office of Gensler & Associates, an architecture and interior design firm that specializes in sustainable projects like a complex that houses the NFL’s Dallas Cowboys. The talented designers saw a blooming desert and a cozy arctic village, an old urban mill re-purposed as an energy producer, a data center that integrates solar panels on its sprawling flat roofs, a naval base and a humming transit hub.

In the converted mill, high temperat…

Seeing the Light on Nuclear Energy

If you think that there is plenty of electricity, that the air is clean enough and that nuclear power is a just one among many options for meeting human needs, then you are probably over-focused on the United States or Western Europe. Even then, you’d be wrong.

That’s the idea at the heart of a new book, “Seeing the Light: The Case for Nuclear Power in the 21st Century,” by Scott L. Montgomery, a geoscientist and energy expert, and Thomas Graham Jr., a retired ambassador and arms control expert.


Billions of people live in energy poverty, they write, and even those who don’t, those who live in places where there is always an electric outlet or a light switch handy, we need to unmake the last 200 years of energy history, and move to non-carbon sources. Energy is integral to our lives but the authors cite a World Health Organization estimate that more than 6.5 million people die each year from air pollution.  In addition, they say, the global climate is heading for ruinous instability. E…