A Non-Proliferation Success Story

Last night's edition of the NewsHour on PBS featured a piece on the joint efforts between the U.S. and Russia to dismantle Russian nuclear weapons in order to keep them from falling into the wrong hands.

Here's an excerpt from the report:

PAVEL FELGENHAUER: Decommissioning means that they're dismantled. But the material that they were composed of didn't disappear much. That means it's stored somewhere, most likely stored in much less secure conditions than it was when it was a nuclear warhead.

So dismantling nuclear weapons is good, but that means that the material is less secure as a result. It's not an easy situation, and it's made worse by a mutual lack of trust, by ambiguity over the direction in which U.S.-Russian relations develop.

Reading that, it's easy to get the impression that those warheads are just lying around, and that the U.S. isn't doing much at all to get rid of them.

But that's not the case.

For the last 11 years, the U.S. has been purchasing dismantled Russian warheads and downblending the highly enriched uranium (HEU) for use in American nuclear reactors. The program is called Megatons to Megawatts, and it's administered by USEC, a company based in Bethesda, Maryland.

As of last October, the program had dismantled an incredible 9,000 warheads, and is on track to hit the 10,000 mark this September.

Here are some more details from USEC:

The program will recycle 500 metric tons of bomb-grade uranium into fuel by its conclusion in 2013. Approximately ten percent of America’s electricity is produced using Megatons to Megawatts fuel.

Once blended down to low-enriched uranium fuel, the material is no longer usable in a nuclear weapon. USEC purchases approximately $450 million of the fuel annually. Russia uses that money to support nuclear safety, environmental and security programs. To date, USEC has paid the Russian treasury over $3.5 billion for purchases of the fuel. By the program’s end, total purchases from Russia will be approximately $8 billion.

So, Russian nuclear weapons get dismantled, the HEU is downblended into reactor fuel which we then use to generate electricity here in the U.S. What's not to like?

It's clearly one of the greatest success stories in the history of nuclear non-proliferation. But in last night's report, there wasn't even a hint that it existed.

After I found the transcript of last night's show, I sent a note to Charles Yulish, Vice President of Corporate Communications with USEC, asking him about the omission.

I watched the show and wondered about it myself. We have been after PBS and the News Hour for years, trying to get an appointment with Ray Suarez, all without success

In a subsequent note, Charles had this to say:

At the 2003 Global Economic Forum, our CEO spoke with Suarez about M2M and Ray said he wanted to know more about the program. I tried to follow through by contacting him on at least four separate occasions by mail and phone, and I never got even the courtesy of a reply. When I finally reached his assistant he declined to let me speak with Suarez even by phone. I guess he thought that the elimination of nuclear warheads was not newsworthy.

That's a shame. This story has been underreported, and deserves more attention.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Environment, Energy, Politics, Technology, Economics

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog