Skip to main content

SCANA Considers New Nuclear Build

From The State (S.C.):
Nuclear energy — long a radioactive bugaboo among institutional lenders — is now a power source that is getting another look, said William B. Timmerman, SCANA Corp. chairman and chief executive.

Answering an investor’s question during SCANA’s annual meeting Thursday in Columbia, Timmerman said that given the current energy environment, nuclear energy has to be on the table when making plans to meet the state’s growing power demands.

“If you asked me that two years ago, I’d say not on my watch,” Timmerman said.

Further . . .
Specifically, SCANA is dealing with:

• Increasing costs of other fuel sources such as coal and natural gas

• Environmental concerns and costs of cleanup associated with using those fuels

• An ever-growing demand for power.

For the next decade, Timmerman said SCANA can address anticipated power demands in South Carolina. After that, though, adding nuclear plants could be an option, especially if coal and natural gas prices remain high.

A few weeks ago, we reported that South Carolina state officials will be meeting in Columbia with utility executives on May 9 to dicuss new plants. Representatives from the NuStart Consortium are also expected to participate.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Anonymous said…
Don't forget that when a company builds a new nuclear site they are going to pass the cost onto their customers. I would imagine a new nuclear site will cost somewhere above $5 billion so consumers will need to get out their checkbooks to get the same old electricity they always have but now pay more for it. SCANA's approach to building is the reason they use to justify raising rates and earning more money.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …