China Pledges $48 Billion for New Reactors

Beijing has pledged over $48 billion toward the construction of new nuclear reactors by the year 2020, the state-run China Daily reported on Tuesday.

Kang Rixin, president of China National Nuclear, announced plans to quadruple the country'’s nuclear capacity to 16 gigawatts (GW) from the current 4 GW.

But even this represents just a small fraction of energy-hungry China's appetite. Sixteen gigawatts comes to only 4 percent of China'’s total electrical demand. "“Four per cent is not an ultimate goal, it is a temporary goal," the China Daily quoted Kang as saying.

Estimates are that China intends to build as many as 30 nuclear reactors within the next 15 years, but energy analysts say that total will be a mere drop in the bucket. "China would need to build one new 1 gigawatt reactor every week in order to keep pace just with current energy demand growth," said Jiang Lin, an energy researcher at Lawrence Berkeley Labs in Berkeley, California.

With energy demand rising 14 percent in 2003 and 16 percent in 2004, China has been doing all it can to keep up:

China currently has between 130 GW and 160 GW of electrical generating capacity either already approved or under construction. Close to 80 percent of that new capacity, however, will be in coal-fired plants.

That's not exactly good news if you're concerned about CO2 emissions -- which is why China's nuclear energy industry will become all the more vital.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Environment, Energy, Politics, Technology, Economics

Comments

Anonymous said…

Sir:
Eighty percent of electricity plants to-be-built are from coal?
One can understand why pres Bush is pushng for nuclear power not only in the USA and China, but just now, India
Vern Cornell

July 19, 2005 at 11:24 PM

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog