Skip to main content

U.K. Nuclear Update

The piece by Max Hastings supporting nuclear energy in yesterday's Guardian (U.K.) that we linked to is getting a lot of play on the newspaper's letters page:
Putting new reactors at existing sites would speed the planning process, enable the use of existing power lines and reduce site acquisition, management and security costs. Using off-the-shelf designs and a rolling programme, starting where reactors have already closed, would reduce construction times and costs. Hastings' vision of life in 50 years' time neglected to explain that by then power will probably be from clean fusion reactors. He also did not mention that much of this country's stockpile of nuclear waste comes from past military programmes. A replacement generation of nuclear fission power stations would add only 10% to our existing stocks.

Steve Bolter
Gestingthorpe, Essex
What the reader describes above is more or less what the American nuclear industry is doing today, and it's a model that the U.K. could emulate quite easily.

Here's another reader that's not quite as sanguine:
Hastings would have some credibility if he offered to have a nuclear power station near his house. From where I live I can see two nuclear power stations, the chimney of an oilfired power station and two wind farms. There is no doubt which are the most beautiful as well as the most environmentally friendly.

Norman Lamond
Rothesay, Isle of Bute
I guess this conclusion depends on just what you consider to be environmentally friendly -- and nuclear energy's clean air benefits are pretty clear.

As for coal plants and wind farms being more visually pleasing than a nuclear power station, there are more than a few folks in England, and elsewhere, that believe that wind farms are a blight on the landscape.

While doing research for this post., I came across a quote from former U.K. Energy Minister Brian Wilson where he comments on folks who are fighting the deployment of wind farms in the English countryside:
People must take a balanced view and we must act collectively. If we are to have a serious renewables industry, we must be able to drive forward projects without them being blocked for years, sometimes on unreasonable grounds.
While he might be talking about wind farms, he may as well have been talking about nuclear power plants. And I think that its important to point out, once again, that we don't oppose wind farms or the development of any renewable energy source. But we do need to realize that NIMBYism can have an impact even on renewable energy sources that environmental activists tout as a magic bullet to the nation's and the world's energy needs.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Rod Adams said…
Eric:
I read Norman's quote from the Isle of Bute. In my opinion he provided a great hint for the nuclear industry. Perhaps if we pay a little more attention to esthetics in our future designs, we can win the hearts of people like Norman.
The nature of fission power allows us to design plants with very low visual impact that can blend into their environment; we do not have to employ tall smokestacks or even mushroom shaped cooling towers that dwarf the reactor containment vessel.
Rod Adams
www.atomicinsights.com
(Now blogging at http://atomicinsights.blogspot.com/
Matthew66 said…
Agree that esthetics do play an important role, and the reactor and turnbine halls could probably even be buried. For many environmentalists, waste heat is an issue, in France last summer many reactors were operating at reduced capacity because the rivers into which they discharged their cooling water were getting too hot. If plant vendors can design an esthetically pleasing cooling tower that might be helpful. Even then, they won't please everyone, some people are just opposed to industrial development of any kind.

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin