Tour A Nuclear Power Plant

Since 9-11, many nuclear power plants have ceased to offer public tours of their facilities. While those decisions were undeniably necessary, it's a shame, as there simply isn't a better educational tool for our industry.

Which is why everyone who cares about the industry ought to watch this video tour of the Columbia Generating Plant produced by Energy Northwest:

Thanks to the folks at Energy Northwest for producing a superior piece of video. For more on the Columbia Generating Station, click here.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power, Electricity, Environment, Energy

Comments

Anonymous said…

That is a great video. I don't know how widely it has been distributed, but there certainly needs to be more information like this out there.

April 3, 2006 at 6:15 PM

distantbody said…

That video was going great until she mentioned "Energy Northwest has a diverse energy portfolio". I would at least hope that they don't use dreadful wind power, because it's absolutely farcical.

April 3, 2006 at 11:59 PM

Anonymous said…

how is it undeniably necessary?

Stupid overreaction. We have one year where some people die, less than die of the flu every year, and our whole life changes in an overeaction reminiscent to moral panic.

It's false security. What does this help? Tells the terrorists how to get in? If the plants have no security on the inside we're screwed anyways. A janitor or someone posing as a vendor and entering the plant shouldn't be able to enter any door he wants.

I'm sick of people overreacting and ruining america. Screw the terrorists- I aint skeered.

June 23, 2008 at 12:48 AM

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog