Skip to main content

EU Rejects Kozloduy Appeal, Even in the Face of Rising Electricity Prices

From the EU Observer:
Bulgaria's plea to restart two reactors at the Kozloduy nuclear power plant has suffered a blow, with the European Commission appearing to reject the idea despite growing pressure from the Balkans in support of Sofia.

On Monday (13 March), four Balkan countries - Serbia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Albania and Croatia - adopted a declaration, asking the EU to allow Bulgaria to resume electricity production and warning of grim consequences if the two reactors were not reopened.

"We are concerned about the current electricity supply problems of the region, which could result in higher economic and political instability," the common statement, cited by the BBC, said. The statement also claimed that electricity prices had jumped 80-100% when compared with last year.

Prior to the shut-down in 2006, Bulgaria exported 7.8 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity, the amount that roughly equals to what the two nuclear reactors in Kozloduy produced.
I guess the EU would rather have these member states importing Russian natural gas to generate their electricity. For more from our archive, click here.

Comments

Joffan said…
Crazy.

I suggest that Bulgaria accepts that Kozloduy 3 & 4 are closed, paints over the numbers and looks to open the new reactors Kozloduy 7 & 8.
Anonymous said…
Another idea would be that the Bulgarians tell the EU bureaucrats to stuff it. A nation has a duty to its citizens to look out for their welfare. Energy supply is a national interest. It makes no sense that the EU would compel a sovereign state to stick it's head in the noose of relying on Russian natural gas.
Joffan said…
Yes... The Bulgarians would of course need to return the compensation money given to them by the EU but I imagine that was already part of the Bulgarians' restart request.
Anonymous said…
Sounds like it's a no-brainer. Return the bribe money and go a long way towards energy self-sufficiency, or accept the bribe and put yourself at the mercy of your Russian natural gas supplier. A lot of good that EU payoff will be to the Bulgarians when they find themselves at the end of a short rope held by Putin.
Jan Haverkamp said…
1. Neither of the mentioned countries had different problems than during other years - Albania even managed to crank up its electricity availability from January because of upcoming elections.
2. Cernavoda 2 comes on-line after summer, keeping the existing over-capacity in the region well on level.
3. None of the involved countries in the region has a development plan for energy efficiency and/or renewable energy.

conclusion: the discussion about Kozloduy 3 and 4 is only to try to get more compensation from the EU...

Popular posts from this blog

Making Clouds for a Living

Donell Banks works at Southern Nuclear’s Plant Vogtle units 3 and 4 as a shift supervisor in Operations, but is in the process of transitioning to his newly appointed role as the daily work controls manager. He has been in the nuclear energy industry for about 11 years.

I love what I do because I have the unique opportunity to help shape the direction and influence the culture for the future of nuclear power in the United States. Every single day presents a new challenge, but I wouldn't have it any other way. As a shift supervisor, I was primarily responsible for managing the development of procedures and programs to support operation of the first new nuclear units in the United States in more than 30 years. As the daily work controls manager, I will be responsible for oversight of the execution and scheduling of daily work to ensure organizational readiness to operate the new units.

I envision a nuclear energy industry that leverages the technology of today to improve efficiency…

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear: Energy for All Political Seasons

The electoral college will soon confirm a surprise election result, Donald Trump. However, in the electricity world, there are fewer surprises – physics and economics will continue to apply, and Republicans and Democrats are going to find a lot to like about nuclear energy over the next four years.

In a Trump administration, the carbon conversation is going to be less prominent. But the nuclear value proposition is still there. We bring steady jobs to rural areas, including in the Rust Belt, which put Donald Trump in office. Nuclear plants keep the surrounding communities vibrant.

We hold down electricity costs for the whole economy. We provide energy diversity, reducing the risk of disruption. We are a critical part of America’s industrial infrastructure, and the importance of infrastructure is something that President-Elect Trump has stressed.

One of our infrastructure challenges is natural gas pipelines, which have gotten more congested as extremely low gas prices have pulled m…