Skip to main content

James Lovelock on Germany's Nuclear Phaseout

James Lovelock, the originator of the Gaia Theory and a prominent pro-nuclear environmentalist was interviewed by the Guardian today. He was as provocative as always, and had this to say about Germany's planned phase-out of nuclear energy:
"It looks to me as if the green ideas they have picked up now could be just as damaging. They are burning lignite now to try to make up for switching off nuclear. They call themselves green, but to me this is utter madness."
How mad is it? Click here for a piece from Brad Plumer of the Washington Post.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Good for Germany!
I too once thought nuclear power was the only way forward and then Fukushima happened...
I would sooner let fairly harmless co2 become more abundant rather than radiation kill every life form on this planet. Historic evidence shows co2 rises and falls regardless if it is created by man or not.
Albert Einstein warned us about Uranium, we’ve ignored him and now we will all die as a result!
Power from Uranium is floored through and through but we still plough head-on into extinction.
Shut down ALL of these non-stoppable death machines (if we can) before it is too late!
mf said…
then you should know this: burning coal is the most significant source of man-made radiation in the atmosphere. Ans not just any radiation, but alpha emitters that you inhale.
jimwg said…
Anonymous, do some non-Greenpeace recommended research, uh?
Sigh!

James Greenidge
Queens NY
It's all very well to be wise after the event. James Lovelock may be very wise but not necessarily right. What we have to ask ourselves is whether the historical record of nuclear power has sufficient empirical data to prove it is within a statistically reliable level of reasonable risk. It only takes one catastrophic event to render these speculative hypotheses utterly unacceptable, so since Fukushima may already be that event, we have no other choice than to seek alternative means of energy procurement. It may be unwelcome but it is necessary. Fukushima remains an enormous threat since even the gravity of the health "fallout" from Chernobyl is still disputed. We are playing with dice, without the instinctive skills to read the warning signs. The problem is basically twofold: the first is the abject precocity of our pretensions to knowledge, but the second is the level of PR disinformation spun out by the international nuclear-weapons cartel. We need to heed the most reliable data on Fukushima, and ignore the blandishments of those vested interests that could destroy our biospheric habitat, endangering all life on earth from sheer ignorance and hubris. Who are these authorities? They are not gods, but children playing with forces they cannot possibly understand nor control...
moriarty said…
Germany's only right in scrapping conventional nuclear power; she needs to replace it with thorium though as this is the safe form. Meltdown proof and leaves no long lived waste. Replacing nuclear with fossil fuels is indeed madness.
moriarty said…
Nuclear power is indeed the only way forward, but it needs to be liquid fluoride thorium reactors instead of conventional nuclear power. Germany's current stance is madness indeed to be scrapping nuclear power altogether.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …