Skip to main content

The Price Point in Japan

fourth-reactor-building-ohi-nuclear-power-plant-433250Outside Japan, it seemed inevitable:

Japan has given final approval for the restart of two nuclear reactors, a move that will end a total shutdown of the atomic power sector caused by safety fears raised by last year’s crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi plant.

Inevitable because the Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda worked hard to get the approval of the prefecture (state) officials because all signs were that Japan would suffer brownouts and blackouts without the Oi (I’ve also seen it as Ohi) reactors in Fukui Prefecture. In any event, though the announcement is notable, it will still take awhile to get the reactors back online.

Kansai Electric said that further tests and checks were required for the two Oi reactors, but it expected to be able to start generating electricity with the No 3 unit in early July, with No 4 following later in the month. It would take each reactor a few days after being restarted to reach full output, the company said.

Which sounds like good timing. The Japanese, much like Americans, appreciate air conditioning. More seriously, Japan’s industrial sector stands to be seriously hemmed in, though the story says this particular restart is more about the air conditioning, allowing Kansai Electric to just about meet its forecast of need output for the summer.

But it’s just the beginning.

Japanese media said leading candidates [to be brought back online] would be a reactor at Shikoku Electric Power’s Ikata plant in Ehime prefecture and two units at Hokkaido Electric Power’s Tomari plant on the northern island of Hokkaido.

---

Japan has not yet released in energy roadmap, expected sometime this summer. But it has already taken a larger interest in renewable energy sources.

Industry Minister Yukio Edano approved the introduction of feed-in tariffs (FIT), which means higher rates will be paid for renewable energy. The move could expand revenue from renewable generation and related equipment to more than $30 billion by 2016, brokerage CLSA estimates.

Whatever happens to the nuclear reactors, it certainly isn’t a bad idea to use what resource-poor Japan has on hand. The problem is that nuclear energy is relatively (a lot) less expensive.

The scheme requires Japanese utilities to buy electricity from renewable sources such as solar, wind and geothermal at pre-set premiums for up to 20 years. Costs will be passed on to consumers through higher bills.

We can’t guess what Japan will do with its energy mix. Using nuclear, wind and solar energy in tandem and shutting down fossil fuel plants will allow Japan to lower its carbon emissions. Other combinations will not.

Odd detail:

Wind power will be subsidized at least 23.1 yen per kwh, compared with as low as 4.87 euro cents (6 U.S. cents) in Germany.

That doesn’t tell you anything, does it? In fact, 23.1 yen is 29 cents – not good at all. This story from World Nuclear News provides some sense of relative cost within Japan:

Cost estimates made in 2004 by a Japanese government sub-committee put the cost of nuclear generation at ¥5.30 ($0.07) per kWh, by far the cheapest means of generating electricity, with oil at ¥10.70 ($0.14), coal at ¥5.70 ($0.07), gas at ¥6.20 ($0.08) and hydro at ¥11.90 ($0.16).

According to the story, the accident at Fukushima Daiichi raises that cost by, at most, another two cents per kWh. That makes coal and natural gas more competitive, but not renewable energy sources – wind energy not at all – certainly not with those subsides in place.

The O(h)I facility.

Comments

Joffan said…
Ohi's phase-1 safety review was approved ages ago. Is there an online source for the approval status of the other Japanese reactors?
jimwg said…
Japan almost religiously prides its scenic treasures, so I wonder how they're going to wrap themselves around windmills razing forests and mountainsides for noisy intermittent power. Vermont, take note!

James Greenidge
Queens NY

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …