Skip to main content

RIC Roundup

By Eric McErlain
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's 17th annual Regulatory Information Conference is taking place in the Washington suburbs this week, and it's an important event on the industry calendar, as it gives both the Commission and the nuclear energy industry a chance to share a common forum on a wide vareity of issues.

Today, NEI President and CEO Skip Bowman spoke at an NEI-sponsored luncheon on the topic of the need for regulatory stability:

But this commitment to safety-focused, performance-based regulation leading to realistic conservatism needs to move beyond the reactor oversight process and be codified in regulatory space. It must move beyond strong statements by today’s strong leaders and be codified into regulation.

So much of the progress made to date has been driven by the leadership of this commission and today’s staff, but it seems sometimes to be based on verbal statements of policy.

Since operators, regulators and other stakeholders agree that this approach best achieves our separate responsibilities and leads to our common goals, we should cast them in stone and bring them down from the mountain.

That means we need to codify a safety-focused, performance-based approach to the agency’s entire span of regulatory responsibility. This approach should be conservative, yet realistic.


Click here for the remarks of NRC Chairman Nils Diaz, and here for the remarks of Commissioner Jeffrey Merrifield from the opening day of the conference.

For more, visit the NEI Speech Archive, or click here for the NRC counterpart.

UPDATE: Click here for the conference program which contains links to most of the presentations.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more