Skip to main content

A Short Energy Quiz Update

In a 1981 back-issue of MOTHER EARTH NEWS.com, an article titled “A Short Energy Quiz” described the contributions of various sources of energy to US power consumption. The article claimed that the winner, “by a wide margin,” was coal, and that the contribution of atomic power to the fuel mix was slim and slipping.

In fact, the notion that nuclear energy’s contribution to the US power supply was declining was conventional wisdom in the early 1980s. It appears a few things have changed since Mother Earth News published their “quiz”—so we thought we might give an updated quiz of our own.

List, in descending order, the relative contributions of the following sources of energy to our nation’s power consumption: coal, gas, hydro, nuclear, and oil. Ready? While coal generation does account for about half the United States’ electric power consumption, the fact is that nuclear generation is a not-so-distant second. According to statistics published by the Energy Information Administration (a statistical agency of the US Department of Energy), nuclear energy meets 20% of our nation’s electricity needs, and has consistently done so for over a decade, despite the fact that electricity demand has increased by almost 18% over the same time period.

Nuclear power not only meets one-fifth of the country’s electricity needs, but it does so without the emission of harmful greenhouse gases like sulfur and carbon dioxides. In fact, nuclear power is the largest clean-air source of electricity, producing 70% of non-emitting generation in the United States.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin