Skip to main content

From the NEI Clip File

Here are some news clips we're reading today at NEI. Science and technology Web site RedNova is asking its readers if they are "Ready for a Nuclear Comeback?":
Ray Ganthner sells new nuclear power plants.

His industry has had a rough couple of decades, he acknowledges. But one recent development is making his job easier. His company, Maryland-based Framatome ANP, designed the $3 billion-plus nuclear plant going up in Finland, the first built in Western Europe in more than a decade.

"I point out we're the only company building one," said Ganthner, a senior vice president for the firm, which has a 500-employee office in University City.

Ganthner and his team of engineers are hoping the European plant helps to spur a renaissance of nuclear plant construction across the United States and in the Carolinas.

The team for Framatome is working to translate the Finland design into U.S. specifications, to get it approved by U.S. regulators. They're trying to convince U.S. utilities to become the first to order a new reactor since the '70s.

The question is: Are Carolinians and Americans ready for it?
I'm sure you can guess what our answer is. Also at RedNova, there's some news on the uranium front in South Carolina:
Hydrogen fuel research in South Carolina will get another major international player today when the University of South Carolina signs its second partnership in its Next Energy initiative with Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems of Freiburg, Germany.

USC hopes to show "measurable" results from the partnership in the coming academic year, said Tony Boccanfuso, USC's director of research and economic development. He said USC hopes the partnership will grow to include Fraunhofer ISE as a resident on the new Columbia research campus being developed around Assembly Street.

Boccanfuso said Fraunhofer is one of the world's leading research groups focusing on the commercialization of new energy technologies. He said commercialization is a top priority for both USC and Fraunhofer.
And finally, in Australia, the debate about a future with nuclear energy continues, this time around uranium enrichment:
Uranium explorer Hindmarsh Resources' chief Kate Hobbs said the Federal Government was content for Australia to be involved in mining and exporting uranium.

Enriching uranium would give Australia greater control over its end use, she said, while also adding value to the resource.
Advertisement:

"Australia has probably got one of the most responsible statutory environments and I think we need to carefully look at if we were to take part in the enrichment of it, we might have a greater influence over its eventual use," Ms Hobbs said.

"I think that we should responsibly be looking at . . . the whole train from exploration, through mining, through enrichment, through using it as a power source and disposal, which we are ideally fitted to do."
Check back every day for new content from the NEI Clip File.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin