Skip to main content

The Nuclear Energy Industry Posts The Help Wanted Sign

In a recent speech, NRC Chairman Dale Klein warned of the risk that the nuclear industry will face a shortage of skilled workers: "Every segment of the nuclear industry needs to work to increase the talent pool, though, so that we are not competing for a small number of candidates. If we all spend the next 20 years waving money and benefits at the same people, there will be winners and losers."

The competition for nuclear workers has already begun, and at least one company appears determined to be one of the winners. In addition to the usual college recruiting and advertisements in trade publications, it is sending interviewers to cities where its competitors have major offices. Employees of those competitors are receiving letters inviting them to come for interviews. Some people are actually receiving these letters AT WORK!

Readers should note that the nuclear industry requires workers from many disciplines. Take engineers, for example. The nuclear industry hires nuclear engineers, of course, but it also needs mechanical, electrical, civil, structural, and even materials engineers. If you work in an industry that is not doing well, you might want to think about switching to nuclear. For more information, check out the Careers and Education section on our public Web site.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Anonymous said…
What about software engineers? While I don't know much about the details, I imagine that like all large industrial facilities, there's a fair amount of computer software involved, and somebody's got to write it.

My field of actual professional expertise is software testing (I'm a postdoc in the area), and I've seen a couple of academic papers related to testing of software-based components for nuclear power plants. One important issue here is the modelling of reliability of software components; some of the statistical techniques appropriate for assessing hardware reliability (testing a bunch of identical components to find the defect rate, for instance), don't work well in the context of software, and thus different approaches are needed.
Kevin McCoy said…
Robert,
Here is what I found from the web site of one major nuclear company. Out of 119 open positions (!) for full-time engineers, 13 seemed to be related to software engineering. Here's the breakdown:

4 instrumentation and control
5 software (unspecified)
1 code development
1 software verification and validation
2 supervisory control and data acquisition

So, yes, software engineers should have been included in the list.
Anonymous said…
Employment is at will. If one company does not compensate or treat their employees well, then I see no issue with other companies recruiting them. Supply and demand controls price. When business goes bad, companies have no problems with terminating large quatities of people with only a couple weeks notice. Power to the people!

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin