Skip to main content

More on Last Week's Florida Power Outage

For those who have not heard what the cause was:
A Florida Power & Light engineer not following proper procedure was the sole cause of Tuesday's massive power outage that left millions without electricity throughout the state for a few hours, FPL officials said Friday.


FPL President Armando Olivera said a preliminary investigation found that not one customer would have lost power had proper procedure been followed. The engineer, who Olivera refused to name, disabled two levels of relay protection, while diagnosing a piece of malfunctioning equipment. When the equipment short-circuited, there were no protective measures in place.


The engineer was working on a piece of equipment that controls voltage at the Flagami substation in West Miami. While he was diagnosing the problem, an arc -- originally thought to be a small fire -- occurred and melted some of the equipment. Since the protective relays had been disabled, there was nothing in place to contain the problem.


Olivera said changes in how protection relays were governed are already in place. He also said that once a full investigation is complete, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) would conduct a review of the findings.
According to Annex B of the World Energy Outlook 2006, 25 percent of the world's population had no access to electricity in 2005. While the brief Florida outage was an inconvenience, everyone should recognize that 1.6 billion people live in this world every day without access to the benefits of electricity.


Anonymous said…
Anyone want to take odds on those who blamed the outage on the Turkey Point reactors going offline coming forward to admit their error? My guess is those would be pretty long odds.
Anonymous said…
Anyone want to take odds on those who blamed the outage on the Turkey Point reactors going offline coming forward to admit their error? My guess is those would be pretty long odds.
Anonymous said…
My question is this: who was the supervisor and manager for the engineer who made a mistake? It's easy to find a scape goat. Is that what this is? problems like this usually happen because of lack of procedures, training and management oversight. It's very rare for one lone engineer to go itby himself and "wing it", but if he wasn't nuclear trained, I suppose it's possible. I just want to see his manager take some accountability if there is accountability to be shared. There are too many scape goats.
Anonymous said…
I wouldn't mind the electric utilities cutting off electricity for a month to radical environmentalists who want to shut down power plants. Both at their homes and their work.
Anonymous said…
The engineer wasn't working at a nuclear station - he was somewhere out in the power grid at a major switching station. When the slow-clearing fault spread its effects outward into the system, the nuclear reactors went down due to the severe effects on voltage and frequency. It is common to let experienced engineers work on difficult problems - after all, they are the 'experts' and he should have known better than to disable the second 'backup' level of protection.

Popular posts from this blog

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.


The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.

What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

A Billion Miles Under Nuclear Energy (Updated)

And the winner is…Cassini-Huygens, in triple overtime.

The spaceship conceived in 1982 and launched fifteen years later, will crash into Saturn on September 15, after a mission of 19 years and 355 days, powered by the audacity and technical prowess of scientists and engineers from 17 different countries, and 72 pounds of plutonium.

The mission was so successful that it was extended three times; it was intended to last only until 2008.

Since April, the ship has been continuing to orbit Saturn, swinging through the 1,500-mile gap between the planet and its rings, an area not previously explored. This is a good maneuver for a spaceship nearing the end of its mission, since colliding with a rock could end things early.

Cassini will dive a little deeper and plunge toward Saturn’s surface, where it will transmit data until it burns up in the planet’s atmosphere. The radio signal will arrive here early Friday morning, Eastern time. A NASA video explains.

In the years since Cassini has launc…