Skip to main content

More on Last Week's Florida Power Outage

For those who have not heard what the cause was:
A Florida Power & Light engineer not following proper procedure was the sole cause of Tuesday's massive power outage that left millions without electricity throughout the state for a few hours, FPL officials said Friday.

...

FPL President Armando Olivera said a preliminary investigation found that not one customer would have lost power had proper procedure been followed. The engineer, who Olivera refused to name, disabled two levels of relay protection, while diagnosing a piece of malfunctioning equipment. When the equipment short-circuited, there were no protective measures in place.

...

The engineer was working on a piece of equipment that controls voltage at the Flagami substation in West Miami. While he was diagnosing the problem, an arc -- originally thought to be a small fire -- occurred and melted some of the equipment. Since the protective relays had been disabled, there was nothing in place to contain the problem.

...

Olivera said changes in how protection relays were governed are already in place. He also said that once a full investigation is complete, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) would conduct a review of the findings.
According to Annex B of the World Energy Outlook 2006, 25 percent of the world's population had no access to electricity in 2005. While the brief Florida outage was an inconvenience, everyone should recognize that 1.6 billion people live in this world every day without access to the benefits of electricity.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Anyone want to take odds on those who blamed the outage on the Turkey Point reactors going offline coming forward to admit their error? My guess is those would be pretty long odds.
Anonymous said…
Anyone want to take odds on those who blamed the outage on the Turkey Point reactors going offline coming forward to admit their error? My guess is those would be pretty long odds.
Anonymous said…
My question is this: who was the supervisor and manager for the engineer who made a mistake? It's easy to find a scape goat. Is that what this is? problems like this usually happen because of lack of procedures, training and management oversight. It's very rare for one lone engineer to go itby himself and "wing it", but if he wasn't nuclear trained, I suppose it's possible. I just want to see his manager take some accountability if there is accountability to be shared. There are too many scape goats.
Anonymous said…
I wouldn't mind the electric utilities cutting off electricity for a month to radical environmentalists who want to shut down power plants. Both at their homes and their work.
Anonymous said…
The engineer wasn't working at a nuclear station - he was somewhere out in the power grid at a major switching station. When the slow-clearing fault spread its effects outward into the system, the nuclear reactors went down due to the severe effects on voltage and frequency. It is common to let experienced engineers work on difficult problems - after all, they are the 'experts' and he should have known better than to disable the second 'backup' level of protection.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …