Skip to main content

Cry Havoc and Let Slip the Rains of Gustav

entergy No sooner does Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana open a nuclear fabrication plant in Lake Charles, as noted below, than nature comes a-knocking. A busy man is Governor Jindal. But not only for the state is hurricane Gustav an issue - Entergy has also had its hands full, with almost 900,000 homes and businesses without electricity in the state. This tops the damage done by hurricane Rita in 2005 but does not equal the notorious Katrina of 2006 - which means Entergy has had a miserable time of it, along with gulf coast residents, three of the last four years.

The nuclear news here is that Entergy shut down the River Bend plant in St. Francisville, La., not because the hurricane caused it any difficulties, but because, somewhat ironically, it was chugging away at full power. Because so many transmission lines went down and with them, any kind of demand - plus, as we saw on the news, New Orleanians and others bailed out ahead of the storm, reducing demand further - the plant risked flooding an already unstable grid.

We're thrilled to see that Gustav did not wreck the havoc Katrina did two years ago, though for the people living there, havoc enough. We'll keep an eye open and see how quickly Entergy is able to restore power and get River Bend back on line - they're unfortunately getting to be old hands at this.

We wish our friends at Entergy all the best in sorting out the tangled mess Gustav left them - as we know they are doing the best they know how to for their customers.

Comments

Bill said…
Katrina and Rita were both in 2005. It was a not-so-fun time for those of us who were employed by Entergy.
Anonymous said…
In fact, Katrina was before Rita. I was in Texas when Rita made landfall, and the Texans were acting like the apocalypse was upon us, the memory of Katrina still fresh in their minds.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…