Skip to main content

The I Edition of Global Nuclear Notes: India, Iran, Italy

sourceimagesmallSome updates of stories we've been following here:

Italy has found a partner for its nuclear ambitions. The winner: Great Britain. Here's British PM Gordon Brown:

"We both agreed that nuclear power can play an important part (in achieving) our shared objectives on climate change and energy security."

And his Italian opposite number, Silvio Burlusconi:

"We do hope that there is going to be a single nuclear policy for Europe."

Us, too. He needs to get on the horn with our German friends.

---

An Israeli expert on middle east affairs thinks Iran needs nuclear energy:

"Iran's requirement for nuclear energy is justified... It is very important for Iran to find other sources of energy, especially non oil and non gas," Meir Javedanfar told the Christian Science Monitor.

Faced with a nationwide power shortage problem, the country has scheduled power outages of up to two hours a day throughout the country.

Hmm! We understand that an unstable Iran is an issue for Israel, but we're not thrilled with the games Iran and Russia have been playing. Read the whole thing and see what you think.

---

And India is already talking deals with American nuclear suppliers:

GVK Power & Infrastructure Ltd. and Nuclear Power Corp. plan to buy reactors and equipment from General Electric Co. and Westinghouse Electric Co. when a three- decade ban on India's atomic trade is lifted.

They're jumping the gun a bit - Congress seems unlikely to pass the deal allowing India-U.S. traffic in nuclear materials this term - House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman told the administration he's going to block it - so it may take a new president to get it moved to the full House. We'll see.

We picked this image up from here but couldn't figure out who created it. It's a contest entry: the idea is to start from one image and change it to another in Photoshop. This started as an image of the evil queen from Snow White holding out a poisoned apple - that version was created by Mikkel Lund and is very striking. You can apply symbolism to this variation as suits you.

Comments

Rod Adams said…
One development in world politics that provides some real cause for concern is the very real possibility that an isolated Russia would join forces with an isolated Iran.

As a team, they could help European and American politicians quickly understand what really makes the world economy function - reliable supplies of energy.

Since many important countries in Europe unilaterally disarmed themselves by slowing nuclear power growth and turning their electric power grid into a huge market for natural gas and oil exporters, they would have a rather severe adjustment to make if certain key valves were shut.

Of course, the valves could not stay shut forever without damaging Russian and Iranian economies, but I think fuel suppliers with money in the bank are in a stronger negotiating position than countries without electricity and gas for heating during certain key times of year. Gas storage is far more limited than money storage.

Just thinking out loud here.

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...