Skip to main content

Hearing Report on the “Role of the NRC in America's Energy Future”

Below is a summary of yesterday’s House hearing by NEI’s Senior Director of Political Affairs, Hannah Simone.

This morning the Subcommittee on Energy and Power and the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy conducted a joint hearing entitled, “The Role of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in America’s Energy Future.” Witnesses were four of the five NRC commissioners: The Hon. Gregory B. Jaczko, Chairman; The Hon. Kristine L. Svinicki, Commissioner ; The Hon. William D. Magwood, Commissioner; The Hon. William C. Ostendorff, Commissioner.

Chairman Ed Whitfield and Chairman John Shimkus co-chaired the hearing.

During the three-hour, somewhat contentious hearing, a number of Members – both Republicans and Democrats – questioned the Chairman’s and Commissioners’ actions taken regarding the Yucca Mountain repository. Chairman Upton indicated that he was concerned that the decision-making process at the NRC might be breaking down and while he appreciated the expertise and independence of the Commission, the issue of long-term waste storage of spent fuel had to be addressed.

During Q and A, Chairman Shimkus asked each of the Commissioners if they had filed their votes to withdraw the Yucca Mountain license application – and if they indeed considered it a “vote” rather than “prepared remarks”. Commissioners Svinicki, Magwood and Ostendorff all indicated they cast their vote on the issue. Chairman Jaczko said that this was not a vote and that the Commission had to work to achieve a majority position and then execute it through a Commission order.

A number of other Members questioned the Commissioners repeatedly as to whether or not they believed a vote had been held and why there was not more transparency in the Commission’s actions. Chairman Emeritus Barton stated that he believed Chairman Jaczko was “playing some sort of foot-dragging game.” Congressman Terry said “the level of non-information is frustrating - I'm very disturbed." Congressman Dingell indicated he remained “troubled about Yucca Mountain” and Congressman Inslee said he believed that the NRC “reversed course” on Yucca without the statutory authority from Congress.

One issue that was discussed in depth was a letter sent to Chairman Darrell Issa on behalf of the Commission by Chairman Jaczko in March; the Commissioners all testified that they had approved a different draft than what was sent by the Chairman. Once they learned an “unapproved” draft had been sent, the Commissioners sent their own letter. This was clearly a contentious issue amongst the Commissioners.

Ranking Member Waxman talked about some emails from a NRC staffer that had been leaked and directly asked Chairman Jaczko if he had delayed action on the Yucca Mountain license application for political reasons (he responded no) or if he had directed staff to stop review of Yucca Mountain through illegal channels (he answered no).

Chairman Upton told the Commissioners that this was NOT ending today; he asked if the Commissioners believed that the staff at the NRC was sharing information equally with each of them; all of the Commissioners indicated that it was difficult to ascertain what they didn’t know” but – while at times there was some pushback – staff did share information equally most of the time.

Subcommittee Chairman Whitfield asked Chairman Jaczko about his decision to invoke the 50-mile evacuation zone around the Fukushima plants; he said that he did so at the recommendation of staff. There was then a discussion about invocation of emergency power by the Chairman during the Fukushima situation; the Commissioners each indicated that they had never been notified by the Chairman that he had invoked these powers. The Commissioners were also asked if they were told not to visit the NRC Emergency Operations Center monitoring the situation in Japan; all three Commissioners testified that it was requested they not visit the ERC as they might distract staff.

Other issues mentioned by Members were relicensing of Diablo Canyon (Representative Capps); relicensing of Indian Point (Representative Engell) small reactor license applications (Chairman Upton) and questions about security procedures (Congressman Green)

This is an abbreviated overview of a very long and complex hearing.

Hearing Background Memo

Opening Statement for Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Whitfield

Opening Statement for Environment and Economy Subcommittee Chairman Shimkus

Opening Statement for Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Upton

Testimony for NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Knowing What You’ve Got Before It’s Gone in Nuclear Energy

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior director of policy analysis and strategic planning at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

Nuclear energy is by far the largest source of carbon prevention in the United States, but this is a rough time to be in the business of selling electricity due to cheap natural gas and a flood of subsidized renewable energy. Some nuclear plants have closed prematurely, and others likely will follow.
In recent weeks, Exelon and the Omaha Public Power District said that they might close the Clinton, Quad Cities and Fort Calhoun nuclear reactors. As Joni Mitchell’s famous song says, “Don’t it always seem to go that you don’t what you’ve got ‘til it’s gone.”
More than 100 energy and policy experts will gather in a U.S. Senate meeting room on May 19 to talk about how to improve the viability of existing nuclear plants. The event will be webcast, and a link will be available here.
Unlike other energy sources, nuclear power plants get no specia…

Making Clouds for a Living

Donell Banks works at Southern Nuclear’s Plant Vogtle units 3 and 4 as a shift supervisor in Operations, but is in the process of transitioning to his newly appointed role as the daily work controls manager. He has been in the nuclear energy industry for about 11 years.

I love what I do because I have the unique opportunity to help shape the direction and influence the culture for the future of nuclear power in the United States. Every single day presents a new challenge, but I wouldn't have it any other way. As a shift supervisor, I was primarily responsible for managing the development of procedures and programs to support operation of the first new nuclear units in the United States in more than 30 years. As the daily work controls manager, I will be responsible for oversight of the execution and scheduling of daily work to ensure organizational readiness to operate the new units.

I envision a nuclear energy industry that leverages the technology of today to improve efficiency…

Nuclear: Energy for All Political Seasons

The electoral college will soon confirm a surprise election result, Donald Trump. However, in the electricity world, there are fewer surprises – physics and economics will continue to apply, and Republicans and Democrats are going to find a lot to like about nuclear energy over the next four years.

In a Trump administration, the carbon conversation is going to be less prominent. But the nuclear value proposition is still there. We bring steady jobs to rural areas, including in the Rust Belt, which put Donald Trump in office. Nuclear plants keep the surrounding communities vibrant.

We hold down electricity costs for the whole economy. We provide energy diversity, reducing the risk of disruption. We are a critical part of America’s industrial infrastructure, and the importance of infrastructure is something that President-Elect Trump has stressed.

One of our infrastructure challenges is natural gas pipelines, which have gotten more congested as extremely low gas prices have pulled m…