Skip to main content

Not Wasting Opportunities

apilgrim A few posts down, we spotlighted continued support for nuclear energy from Bill Gates and Warren Buffett. The billionaire’s club may not be big, but it certainly is interested in energy issues. founder Jeff Bezos has contributed to a $19.5 million round of funding for Canadian nuclear fusion startup General Fusion, marking the web billionaire’s first major investment in nuclear energy.

General Fusion describes itself as a venture capital funded company, so this infusion will doubtless be very welcome. Here’s how the company describes what it is doing:

General Fusion’s approach is based on “magnetized target fusion” concepts first developed about 30 years ago. This approach is a hybrid of traditional “magnetic fusion” and “inertial confinement fusion” methods, and involves first confining plasma in a magnetic field, and then compressing the confined plasma to thermonuclear conditions. General Fusion’s patent-pending fusion technology involves the equipment needed to contain and compress the plasma, and the systems needed to manage the process.

And a little more:

Our generator will operate in a repeating cycle, with each cycle culminating in a burst of fusion energy.

Each cycle will involve:

• creating plasma of deuterium and tritium,

• trapping the plasma within a magnetic field,

• compressing the magnetic field and the plasma within it to thermonuclear conditions, and

• capturing the heat that results from the fusion reaction and using it to generate electricity and power the next cycle.

The company says it will be ready to commercialize its technology by the end of the decade, which sort of fits the “always tomorrow” theme that has dominated nuclear fusion projects. But who knows? I’m not sure Bezos’ money will help fusion to find a commercial application any more than any one else’s money has up to now. But it never hurts to think big. Maybe this time, fusion really does have a tomorrow.


The confluence of events this week can certainly, along with elation, cause considerable nervousness. So this seems germane:

The tires on a semitrailer delivering hydrogen to Iowa's only nuclear power plant exploded Tuesday, prompting an alert, but the safety of the plant and the public were never affected, a spokeswoman said.

That would be Duane Arnold. Naturally, that led to:

The tires that blew were on a trailer holding several long tanks of hydrogen. A fire started, but officials didn't know whether the exploding tires caused the fire or the fire caused the tires to pop. The plant's on-site fire brigade and local firefighters responded, prompting the alert.

A fire. Around hydrogen. The fire was put out quickly enough, the driver sent to the hospital and the hydrogen put in storage, but anyone who read about this in little bursts had every right to jitter just a little. But the end result?

The plant remains at 100 percent power. It's operating safely," Nelson [Renee Nelson, spokeswoman for NextEra Energy Resources] said.

So there you go. I doubt this would have made the Iowa papers (much less Business Week, where this account originated) most other weeks.


So why waste an opportunity?

A grass-roots group organized after the Japan nuclear disaster is holding what is expected to be a large rally for nuclear safety at Plymouth Rock on Saturday. Its leaders say it is neither antinuclear nor political in purpose.

“It’s about families. It’s not about politics,’’ said Anna Baker, coleader of Pilgrim: Make Us Safe Today, or Pilgrim: MUST.

The Pilgrim plant? Really? It went online in 1972 and has quietly gone about its business for 40 years, powering about 600,000 homes around about Plymouth (and creating jobs and economic activity and not producing a bunch of emissions). It’s up for license renewal in 2012, so that’s the reason to do something this year.

The protesters sort of grasp that this is a protest against nothing in particular:

To make the rally more positive, the group is focusing on specific problems and proposing solutions. The list begins with the storage of nuclear waste in water inside a plant, which experts say was the source of the greatest danger in the Japanese crisis.

The protest isn’t being held directly in front of Pilgrim but in a nearby state park next to Plymouth Rock. I hope Entergy gets some of the plant employees over there to contribute to the discussion. Sounds like a friendly enough crowd inclined to listen as well as be heard. So why waste an opportunity?

The Pilgrim nuclear plant.


Will Davis said…
I think the original printed report on Project Sherwood which was prepared for the 1958 Geneva Conference said that fusion power was roughly twenty years in the future; the author of this blog post nailed the essence with the statement that fusion is always essentially around the corner. The problem is that when you round the corner, there's another. Kind of like in those haunted houses they build every year for benefits and so forth.... does this mean that fusion energy is indeed a phantom? I wonder.

Thanks for an interesting post!
jimwg said…
Funny how one must rename thermoNUCLEAR energy as the truncated unrelated sounding "Fusion Energy" to gain public acceptence. Educate the public on our current plants.

Popular posts from this blog

Sneak Peek

There's an invisible force powering and propelling our way of life.
It's all around us. You can't feel it. Smell it. Or taste it.
But it's there all the same. And if you look close enough, you can see all the amazing and wondrous things it does.
It not only powers our cities and towns.
And all the high-tech things we love.
It gives us the power to invent.
To explore.
To discover.
To create advanced technologies.
This invisible force creates jobs out of thin air.
It adds billions to our economy.
It's on even when we're not.
And stays on no matter what Mother Nature throws at it.
This invisible force takes us to the outer reaches of outer space.
And to the very depths of our oceans.
It brings us together. And it makes us better.
And most importantly, it has the power to do all this in our lifetime while barely leaving a trace.
Some people might say it's kind of unbelievable.
They wonder, what is this new power that does all these extraordinary things?

A Design Team Pictures the Future of Nuclear Energy

For more than 100 years, the shape and location of human settlements has been defined in large part by energy and water. Cities grew up near natural resources like hydropower, and near water for agricultural, industrial and household use.

So what would the world look like with a new generation of small nuclear reactors that could provide abundant, clean energy for electricity, water pumping and desalination and industrial processes?

Hard to say with precision, but Third Way, the non-partisan think tank, asked the design team at the Washington, D.C. office of Gensler & Associates, an architecture and interior design firm that specializes in sustainable projects like a complex that houses the NFL’s Dallas Cowboys. The talented designers saw a blooming desert and a cozy arctic village, an old urban mill re-purposed as an energy producer, a data center that integrates solar panels on its sprawling flat roofs, a naval base and a humming transit hub.

In the converted mill, high temperat…

Seeing the Light on Nuclear Energy

If you think that there is plenty of electricity, that the air is clean enough and that nuclear power is a just one among many options for meeting human needs, then you are probably over-focused on the United States or Western Europe. Even then, you’d be wrong.

That’s the idea at the heart of a new book, “Seeing the Light: The Case for Nuclear Power in the 21st Century,” by Scott L. Montgomery, a geoscientist and energy expert, and Thomas Graham Jr., a retired ambassador and arms control expert.

Billions of people live in energy poverty, they write, and even those who don’t, those who live in places where there is always an electric outlet or a light switch handy, we need to unmake the last 200 years of energy history, and move to non-carbon sources. Energy is integral to our lives but the authors cite a World Health Organization estimate that more than 6.5 million people die each year from air pollution.  In addition, they say, the global climate is heading for ruinous instability. E…