Skip to main content

So The Dalai Lama Said

dalailama_blogThere are some endorsements you just can’t say very much about:

The Dalai Lama has been an active voice opposing nuclear weapons. But after a whirlwind trip touring the tsunami-devastated northeastern patch of Japan for the first time, the religious figure said he is not absolutely against the promotion of nuclear energy.

Instead, the Dalai Lama on Monday said he is in support of using nuclear energy for peaceful means as a way to bridge the socioeconomic gap in developing countries in the absence of more efficient alternative energy sources.

A little more:

He noted that other energy sources like wind and solar are too inefficient to put into realistic practice to meet the needs of fast-developing countries.

The Dalai Lama sounds a bit like a nuclear energy advocates, though the way he advocates can be surprising:

On Monday, he urged people on both sides of the contentious nuclear argument to look at the issue “holistically.” “Just to look at it from one side then to make a decision is not right,” he said. While speaking to the benefits of nuclear energy, however, he underlined the holistic lens needed to be pointed at the issue of risk as well. Nuclear energy specialists “should take maximum sorts of preparations.”

That’s seeing life through your own particular lens, but I can’t imagine anyone disagreeing.

The Dalai Lama was born Llomo Dondrum in 1935 in China and became the 14th Dalai Lama in 1950 - in the kind of Buddhism he belongs to, the current Dalai Lama is the reincarnation of the previous one. His name within the religion is Tenzin Gyatso.

Technically, he is head of state of Tibet, but after the 1959 Tibetan uprising, he left for India, forming an exile government. Although China prefers for him not to be accepted as legitimate by foreign governments, he almost always is accepted.

He won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989 for his advocacy of the Tibetan state and for the rights of Tibetans.

Comments

gunter said…
Too bad for His Holiness.

I think his karma just ran over his dogma.

I suppose if you believe in reincarnation then you can vow to come back over the next several thousand life time to clean up the radioactive mess.
gunter said…
So what did the Dalai Lama say, again?

In all fairness to His Holiness, this attribution for the support of nuclear power gets a little fishy given that he just signed "No to Nuclear Power" on the 25th commemoration of the Chernobyl nuclear accident along with other Noble Laureates.(April 26, 2011)

The "No To Nuclear Power" letter states in part:

"On the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in Ukraine–and more than two months after the massive earthquake and tsunami that devastated Japan–we the undersigned Nobel Peace Laureates ask you to invest in a safer and more peaceful future by committing to renewable energy sources. It is time to recognize that nuclear power is not a clean, safe or affordable source of energy."

So, something doesn't jibe here.
Who did the translation at this Japanese meeting anyways, TEPCO?
Brian Mays said…
I'll say that something doesn't jibe here, except that it's the Nobel Women's Initiative that is fishy. Notice that Tenzin Gyatso (the 14th Dalai Lama) does not appear among the signatories on the organization's media release about the "open letter."

A later version of the same text includes his name in the list, but it still refers to "nine Nobel Peace Laureates" and this same number appears elsewhere on their website.

Are the NWI people simply not able to count? Or did someone just add the Dalai Lama's name to the list at the last minute?

Personally, I'm more inclined to believe the words of the man himself over some sort of "open letter" that was compiled by an organization that can't even get its own story straight.
gunter said…
Isn't this getting a little like Solomon's Justice?

So, just for sake of the holistically argument as the Dalai Lama advises, would you stake your claim to the "truth" on nuclear power if it meant cutting this precious planet in half at the total loose to us all?

gunter
gunter said…
You post the April 20th media release. Good find, Brian.

Just so we can quit quibbling over documents, please note that it was updated on April 21st with the Dalai Lama signed on, the very busy soul that as he is:

http://nobelwomensinitiative.org/2011/04/no-to-nuclear-power-nobel-laureates/
@gunter

Sorry gunter but there is no way you can escape our naturally radioactive universe. We are constantly exposed to cosmic and terrestrial radiation and experience even more of it when we fly in a plane or take a trip to Denver. And even humans and the food that they eat are also-- naturally radioactive.

The idea that ionizing radiation is somehow foreign to the human experience and that somehow we can live in a totally radiation free environment is pure fantasy!

Popular posts from this blog

Making Clouds for a Living

Donell Banks works at Southern Nuclear’s Plant Vogtle units 3 and 4 as a shift supervisor in Operations, but is in the process of transitioning to his newly appointed role as the daily work controls manager. He has been in the nuclear energy industry for about 11 years.

I love what I do because I have the unique opportunity to help shape the direction and influence the culture for the future of nuclear power in the United States. Every single day presents a new challenge, but I wouldn't have it any other way. As a shift supervisor, I was primarily responsible for managing the development of procedures and programs to support operation of the first new nuclear units in the United States in more than 30 years. As the daily work controls manager, I will be responsible for oversight of the execution and scheduling of daily work to ensure organizational readiness to operate the new units.

I envision a nuclear energy industry that leverages the technology of today to improve efficiency…

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear: Energy for All Political Seasons

The electoral college will soon confirm a surprise election result, Donald Trump. However, in the electricity world, there are fewer surprises – physics and economics will continue to apply, and Republicans and Democrats are going to find a lot to like about nuclear energy over the next four years.

In a Trump administration, the carbon conversation is going to be less prominent. But the nuclear value proposition is still there. We bring steady jobs to rural areas, including in the Rust Belt, which put Donald Trump in office. Nuclear plants keep the surrounding communities vibrant.

We hold down electricity costs for the whole economy. We provide energy diversity, reducing the risk of disruption. We are a critical part of America’s industrial infrastructure, and the importance of infrastructure is something that President-Elect Trump has stressed.

One of our infrastructure challenges is natural gas pipelines, which have gotten more congested as extremely low gas prices have pulled m…