Skip to main content

Making the Transition to the Hydrogen Economy

By Eric McErlain
In the January/February issue of The American Enterprise, William Tucker points out one of the unique advantages of nuclear energy's environmental footprint when it comes to hydrogen production:
Paul Grant of the Electric Power Research Institute has done a fair and objective job of trying to calculate exactly how much power would be required to shift our transportation sector to hydrogen. "Fuel cells now convert 50 percent of their hydrogen energy back to electricity, but let's assume that future technologies can reach 80 percent--which is remarkably high," he says. "With other conversion factors, we would need roughly 230,000 tons of hydrogen a day in liquid form to run our current transportation sector. Producing this would require 400 gigawatts of continuously available electrical power--which is almost double our present capacity.

"To meet this demand, we would need 800 new natural gas generating plants, 500 larger coal plants, 200 new Hoover dams, or 100 French-type nuclear clusters, which are made up of four 1,000-megawatt plants. The total amount of space taken up by the nuclear plants would be 80 square miles--about the size of the District of Columbia. The wind option would require covering 50,000 square miles, the size of New York State. Efficient solar collectors would cover 5,000 square miles, about the size of Connecticut." (Lovins is even less optimistic. He wants to use all of North and South Dakota--150,000 square miles--for the windmill option.)

Grant summarizes the stark realities this way: "If you're really serious about cutting our fossil fuel consumption with hydrogen, nuclear power seems the only sensible option."

In a followup piece that was posted this morning, Tucker had this to say:
As I pointed out in my TAE article, the only realistic scenario for "kicking the oil habit" is to power America's auto fleet with a combination of electricity and hydrogen-from-electricity. The only environmentally benign way to produce this electricity--twice what we consume now--will be nuclear power.

The question is this: Will we experience the whole transition as another "energy crisis?" Or will we start now making a smooth transition to a nuclear-hydrogen economy?

And as the New York Times reported over the weekend, some Americans fed up with rising gas prices aren't waiting to be told:
Ron Gremban and Felix Kramer have modified a Toyota Prius so it can be plugged into a wall outlet . . .

"I've gotten anywhere from 65 to over 100 miles per gallon," said Mr. Gremban, an engineer at CalCars, a small nonprofit group based in Palo Alto, Calif. He gets 40 to 45 miles per gallon driving his normal Prius. And EnergyCS, a small company that has collaborated with CalCars, has modified another Prius with more sophisticated batteries; they claim their Prius gets up to 180 m.p.g. and can travel more than 30 miles on battery power.

"If you cover people's daily commute, maybe they'll go to the gas station once a month," said Mr. Kramer, the founder of CalCars. "That's the whole idea."

For more information on the potential of the hydrogen economy, click here.

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

By
Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...
4 comments
Read more