The Illinois State University chapter of the Student Environmental Action Coaltion ,one of the groups organizing the press conference Kelly Taylor mentioned below, has a website. On the front page is a notice about the NRC hearing tonight in Clinton on the draft Environmental Impact Statement for Exelon's Early Site Permit (ESP) application. The group urges people to attend and says
This is absolutely not the last opportunity for public comment in the licensing process for new nuclear power plants. It is probable that this well-meaning student group is simply parroting what they have been told by the likes of PACE, Public Citizen and NIRS, but I would encourage them, and other environmental groups, to check the facts. If they did, they would find that, in addition to the public comment period on the Environmental Impact Statement, interested citizens can also raise their concerns prior to the NRC's final Safety Evaluation Report and during the evaluation phase for a combined Construction and Operating license (COL). They can even comment during the NRC's post-construction review that ensures that a plant was built in accordance with the requirements of the license (called the Inspection, Test, Analysis, and Acceptance Criteria).
The primary difference from the previous process is that the NRC will resolve all licensing issues prior to a utility making the enormous investment to begin construction. That means that after an ESP and COL are issued, and assuming the proposed plant is of a design already certified by the NRC, the only comments that will be accepted are those that relate to whether the as-built condition matches the licensed design.
Clearly, the new licensing process does not prevent anyone from making their voice heard. Honest environmentalists would do well to stop spreading the lies of antinuclear extremists.
Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Environment, Energy, Politics, Technology, Economics
This is the last opportunity to voice your concerns to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.This is yet another tactic by anti-nuclear extremists that makes my blood boil.
This is absolutely not the last opportunity for public comment in the licensing process for new nuclear power plants. It is probable that this well-meaning student group is simply parroting what they have been told by the likes of PACE, Public Citizen and NIRS, but I would encourage them, and other environmental groups, to check the facts. If they did, they would find that, in addition to the public comment period on the Environmental Impact Statement, interested citizens can also raise their concerns prior to the NRC's final Safety Evaluation Report and during the evaluation phase for a combined Construction and Operating license (COL). They can even comment during the NRC's post-construction review that ensures that a plant was built in accordance with the requirements of the license (called the Inspection, Test, Analysis, and Acceptance Criteria).
The primary difference from the previous process is that the NRC will resolve all licensing issues prior to a utility making the enormous investment to begin construction. That means that after an ESP and COL are issued, and assuming the proposed plant is of a design already certified by the NRC, the only comments that will be accepted are those that relate to whether the as-built condition matches the licensed design.
Clearly, the new licensing process does not prevent anyone from making their voice heard. Honest environmentalists would do well to stop spreading the lies of antinuclear extremists.
Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Environment, Energy, Politics, Technology, Economics
Comments