Skip to main content

More Energy News From NAM

By Eric McErlain
Our friends over at the NAM Blog have been all over energy issues and how they affect American businesses. Earlier this week, NAM's President, Gov. John Engler, went to St. Louis and delivered a speech at Rockwell Automation on the current energy crunch in America's economy, and how it's walloping domestic manufacturing (text, video):
Consumers will pay 48 percent more for natural gas this winter than last year -- and at least 31 percent more for home heating oil. The average household heating bill will top $1,000 for the first time. In some parts of the country, like my home state of Michigan, those figures could be much higher.

For manufacturers, the problems are magnified. Dow Chemical's plastics plant in St. Charles, Louisiana -- a 2,000-acre city of pipes, steel towers and spherical holding tanks -- uses about 100 billion Btu of natural gas every day. The St. Charles plant produces a range of man-made compounds needed to make everything from shampoo to shaving cream, from plastic cups to house paint. We don't even think about these compounds, but they are essential to make the products we use every day.

Every time natural gas prices go up just one dollar, costs at that chemical facility go up about $100 million per year.

It's not that the Dow plant isn't conserving energy. They've cut their usage per pound of output by 22 percent in the last year.

But this year for the first time, Dow's energy costs are expected to exceed 50% of the company's overall sales.
For NAM, part of the answer is authorizing oil and gas exploration of the Outer Continental Shelf. And, as we've said many times before, nuclear energy is a logical choice to displace natural gas-fired electric generation, and free up the supply for home heating and industry.

Elsewhere, NAM has finally compiled the results of its latest energy survey, and the news is pretty grim. 45% of the 10,000 small and medium-sized businesses that participated said that rising energy prices are forcing them to layoff employees, or freeze and cut wages.

Some of the comments from the survey are instructive:
"This is a crisis. It's the worst I've seen since we started this company 45 years ago. I don't think people recognize that this shortage of energy is new to the United States. It's a seismic market disruption."

"We make automotive components. The cost of oil and natural gas has increased our price of materials by as much as 93.1% since March 1, 2004. We will have to resort to job cuts, wage freezes and benefit cuts to stay in business."

"Our paint line ovens and our galvanizing kettle will cost more than double to operate this winter than last. We're trying to compete with imports that don't have this pressure. Our freight costs have doubled because of the price of fuel. This is a crisis for manufacturing."
And finally, click here for the story of Oil-Dry, a company adding a 10% surcharge on all of their shipments due to high natural gas prices.

Looks like times are tough all over.

Technorati tags: , , , , Natural Gas,

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more