Skip to main content

Senate to Consider Sproat Nomination

By Eric McErlain
The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee will be considering the nomination of Ward Sproat to be Director, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management at the Department of Energy. Also on the agenda is the nomination of Jeffrey D. Jarrett to be Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy.

Click here for the live stream of the hearing beginning at 10:30 a.m. U.S. EST. One of my colleagues, Trish Conrad, is at the hearing and will providing a summary later in the day.

UPDATE: For some reason, the live stream doesn't seem to be working. We'll be back with a summary later.

AFTERNOON UPDATE: Thanks to Trish Conrad for this short summary:
The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee held a confirmation hearing earlier today for Edward F. Sproat, III. Sproat has been nominated to serve as the Director of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management at the Department of Energy. Among his other responsibilities, Sproat will oversee the design and license application of the Yucca Mountain Project.

Sproat made a personal statement to the committee then responded to brief questions from Senators Pete Domenici (R-NM), Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) and Richard Burr (R-NC).

In his comments, Sproat stated that nuclear must be a part of the country’s energy portfolio and that it can play an important role in limiting greenhouse gases. He also said that we need to develop a spent fuel repository for our national security.

Upon becoming Director, he said his key goals will be the design and license application for the repository, addressing the related transportation issues and following up on the federal government’s obligation regarding taking possession of used fuel from the country’s nuclear power plants.

He noted that reprocessing technologies may relieve some need for long-term disposal, but that a deep repository would still be needed.

Sproat shared that he will approach the job with six values in mind. They are safety, integrity, quality, accountability, teamwork and continuous improvement.

He has been asked by the committee to respond to a series of written questions. The Committee is expected to vote on the nomination shortly after receiving that document.

Technorati tags: , ,

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more