Skip to main content

Recap: IEA Report on MENA Energy Outlook

Yesterday morning I attended a briefing at CSIS by Fatih Birol of the International Energy Agency, as he made a public rollout of the IEA report on the energy outlook over the next 25 years in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).

His presentation -- click here for a copy (PDF)-- was public and on the record, but the Q&A was off.

Some highlights:

Birol outlined three scenarios for the future:

1) Business as usual, with assumptions on demand, price, regulation and infrastructure investment remaining relatively unchanged (he calls this the "reference scenario"). Global energy prices are projected to increase 50% over the 2004 baseline under the reference scenario.

2) The "deferred investment" scenario, where MENA nations fail to make the necessary investment to keep up with global demand for oil and natural gas -- both in terms of production and refining capacity. Under this model, oil prices will increase 32% above the reference scenario.

3) A final scenario that assumes that consuming nations put policies into place to stem demand (increased CAFE standards, carbon caps, adoption of biofuels and expansion of nuclear). In the case of this scenario, Birol projected a 16% drop in prices and a 10% drop in demand from the reference scenario.

Birol believes that a combination of scenario two and three is very likely -- with scenario two triggering scenario three.

Other observations of note:

a) The world is out of light, sweet crude that works best to make gasoline. What's left has higher sulfur content and will require MENA nations to spend $400 billion to improve refining capacity by 2030 -- 1/3rd of that will have to be used to upgrade current refinery infrastructure. This projection also presumed that there is no viable substitute for petroleum when it comes to powering the transportation sector.

b) Birol said Saudi Arabia does have sufficient reserves to keep up with global demand. The real question is whether or not they have the political will to make the necessary infrastructure improvements.

c) Our reliance on fossil fuel imports from the MENA region will radically increase under every scenario as fossil fuel supplies in OECD nations lose global market share.

d) China will be largest single driver of oil consumption and carbon emissions. Oil imports will increase from 6.3 million barrels per day to 10.3 million by 2030 -- as much as the U.S. imports today.

e) A sustained increase in natural gas prices, combined with a significant drop in demand from consuming nations will most likely result in continued political instability in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Algeria, and Qatar.

This is because like Saudi Arabia, these countries continue to refuse to diversify their economies beyond the energy sector. As their populations, most of which will be under 30 years of age, the need for economic growth and new jobs will become paramount. As a result, a sudden drop in revenues earned from natural gas sales could be very damaging. NB: A similar course in oil markets helped contribute to the fall of the Shah of Iran in 1979.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Why Ex-Im Bank Board Nominations Will Turn the Page on a Dysfunctional Chapter in Washington

In our present era of political discord, could Washington agree to support an agency that creates thousands of American jobs by enabling U.S. companies of all sizes to compete in foreign markets? What if that agency generated nearly billions of dollars more in revenue than the cost of its operations and returned that money – $7 billion over the past two decades – to U.S. taxpayers? In fact, that agency, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), was reauthorized by a large majority of Congress in 2015. To be sure, the matter was not without controversy. A bipartisan House coalition resorted to a rarely-used parliamentary maneuver in order to force a vote. But when Congress voted, Ex-Im Bank won a supermajority in the House and a large majority in the Senate. For almost two years, however, Ex-Im Bank has been unable to function fully because a single Senate committee chairman prevented the confirmation of nominees to its Board of Directors. Without a quorum

NEI Praises Connecticut Action in Support of Nuclear Energy

Earlier this week, Connecticut Gov. Dannel P. Malloy signed SB-1501 into law, legislation that puts nuclear energy on an equal footing with other non-emitting sources of energy in the state’s electricity marketplace. “Gov. Malloy and the state legislature deserve praise for their decision to support Dominion’s Millstone Power Station and the 1,500 Connecticut residents who work there," said NEI President and CEO Maria Korsnick. "By opening the door to Millstone having equal access to auctions open to other non-emitting sources of electricity, the state will help preserve $1.5 billion in economic activity, grid resiliency and reliability, and clean air that all residents of the state can enjoy," Korsnick said. Millstone Power Station Korsnick continued, "Connecticut is the third state to re-balance its electricity marketplace, joining New York and Illinois, which took their own legislative paths to preserving nuclear power plants in 2016. Now attention should