Skip to main content

How Solar Can Provide Peaking Power

By Eric McErlain
A few days ago, my colleague Lisa Stiles-Shell wondered if solar was well positioned to provide peaking power. Through Futurepundit, I found an article concerning some R&D work being done on organic photovoltaics that, "sheds some light" on the subject:
Global Photonic Energy Corporation (GPEC), developer of organic photovoltaic (OPVtm) technology for ultra-low cost high power solar cells, announced that the company's research partners at Princeton University and the University of Southern California (USC) have achieved a new record in an organic solar cell that is responsive to light in the near infrared (NIR) range of the solar spectrum. NIR radiation is invisible to the human eye.

...

Imagine organic photovoltaics coating windows especially in hot climates. Instead of letting in the infrared frequencies the photovoltaics convert those photons to useful electricity. So instead of heating a building and thereby increasing the demand for air conditioning the photovoltaic coating could keep out heat and turn it into electricity that would power air conditioners.
Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Rod Adams said…
Eric:

The problem with coating windows as solar collectors is that windows are generally oriented in the vertical direction.

The quantity of solar energy available for conversion to electricity, however, depends on the angle at which the sun's rays hits the collector.

The formula is a straightforward function of the sine of the angle of incidence. If the collector is oriented at 90 degrees - perpendicular to the sun - the energy is at its maximum value (sine of 90 equals 1) if the angle is 0 degrees (the plane of the collector pointing directly at the sun) the energy per unit area on the collector is ZERO (sine of 0 degrees).

That is why so much effort is spent in designing and building tracking solar collecting systems that constantly change their orientation to maximize the energy collected and why it is so much cooler in the early morning and late afternoon.

IMHO a "peaking system" has to be available when the peak occurs. There may be occasional times and locations when the electricity use peaks when solar energy is at its maximum, but even a broken watch is right twice per day.
January 12, 2006 at 3:51 AM
Akshay Kadidal said…
This is a great new invention, something I have been fantasizing myself.
As for Rod Adam’s comment, it can be used in roof tops coated, window planes can be tilted. And moreover as the sun raises and sets through the day it makes different angles with the window plane and at some stage logically we should be able to tap some energy.
I believe such innovations should continue and should be encouraged with optimism than coming up with criticisms.
January 13, 2006 at 4:34 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more