Skip to main content

More On Long Now Debate on Nuclear Energy

By Eric McErlain
Stewart Brand is passing a note around via blogs and email about the Friday night debate on nuclear energy in San Francisco:
Long Now Presents "Nuclear Power, Climate Change, and the Next 10,000

Fri, Jan 13

Environmentalists are at their best when they disagree publicly. Then discussion can dive through emotional stances to the level of intriguing details and complex tradeoffs, where intelligent opinion forms and smart policy takes shape.

Both of the conversants this Friday night have energy expertise and an environmental agenda. Ralph Cavanagh, co-director of the Energy Program at the Natural Resources Defense Counsel, advisor to the US Secretary of Energy ('93-'03), opposes expansion of nuclear power. Peter Schwartz, a former board member of Rocky Mountain Institute, former head of scenario planning at Royal Dutch/Shell, now chair of Global Business Network, was persuaded by recent research on abrupt climate change to support the expansion of nuclear power.

It's not exactly a debate Friday night, but possibly something better. The format requires each speaker to draw out the other's views and then restate them in a way that satisfies the opponent,"That's right. You got it." Which speaker goes first will be decided by the audience and how they (you!) think the discussion should be framed. If the question is, "Is nuclear power too risky to be an option for dealing with climate change?" then Cavanagh should perhaps go first, stating the affirmative position. If, on the other hand, the question is, "Should nuclear power be an option for dealing with climate change?" then it might be Schwartz's affirmative view that leads off. You decide, live, Friday night.

This is one of a monthly series of Seminars About Long-term Thinking organized by The Long Now Foundation, usually on second Fridays, usually at Fort Mason (though not this one). Future speakers in the series include Stephen Lansing (on a thousand years of finesse in Bali's irrigation system). If you would like to be notified by email of forthcoming talks, please contact Simone Davalos --- 415-561-6582.

You are welcome to forward this note to anyone you think might be interested. The Herbst is a nice big theater.
--Stewart Brand

Venue:
The Herbst Theater
401 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco

Additional Info:
415-561-6581
Http://www.longnow.org
Thanks to Squid List for the pointer.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more