Skip to main content

More On Long Now Debate on Nuclear Energy

By Eric McErlain
Stewart Brand is passing a note around via blogs and email about the Friday night debate on nuclear energy in San Francisco:
Long Now Presents "Nuclear Power, Climate Change, and the Next 10,000

Fri, Jan 13

Environmentalists are at their best when they disagree publicly. Then discussion can dive through emotional stances to the level of intriguing details and complex tradeoffs, where intelligent opinion forms and smart policy takes shape.

Both of the conversants this Friday night have energy expertise and an environmental agenda. Ralph Cavanagh, co-director of the Energy Program at the Natural Resources Defense Counsel, advisor to the US Secretary of Energy ('93-'03), opposes expansion of nuclear power. Peter Schwartz, a former board member of Rocky Mountain Institute, former head of scenario planning at Royal Dutch/Shell, now chair of Global Business Network, was persuaded by recent research on abrupt climate change to support the expansion of nuclear power.

It's not exactly a debate Friday night, but possibly something better. The format requires each speaker to draw out the other's views and then restate them in a way that satisfies the opponent,"That's right. You got it." Which speaker goes first will be decided by the audience and how they (you!) think the discussion should be framed. If the question is, "Is nuclear power too risky to be an option for dealing with climate change?" then Cavanagh should perhaps go first, stating the affirmative position. If, on the other hand, the question is, "Should nuclear power be an option for dealing with climate change?" then it might be Schwartz's affirmative view that leads off. You decide, live, Friday night.

This is one of a monthly series of Seminars About Long-term Thinking organized by The Long Now Foundation, usually on second Fridays, usually at Fort Mason (though not this one). Future speakers in the series include Stephen Lansing (on a thousand years of finesse in Bali's irrigation system). If you would like to be notified by email of forthcoming talks, please contact Simone Davalos --- 415-561-6582.

You are welcome to forward this note to anyone you think might be interested. The Herbst is a nice big theater.
--Stewart Brand

Venue:
The Herbst Theater
401 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco

Additional Info:
415-561-6581
Http://www.longnow.org
Thanks to Squid List for the pointer.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fluor Invests in NuScale

By
You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...
1 comment
Read more

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more