Skip to main content

Russia Restores Natural Gas Flow to Europe

From the Guardian (U.K.):
Russia's image as a reliable international energy supplier became increasingly tarnished yesterday as a stand-off with Ukraine over gas prices disrupted supplies to Europe.

The Russian energy group Gazprom accused Ukraine of stealing about $25m (£14.5m) worth of natural gas from transit supplies destined for other European countries, but most EU members blamed President Vladimir Putin for the crisis. Last night Gazprom appeared to bow to international pressure by increasing transit supplies flowing through Ukraine by the amount allegedly siphoned off.

Germany's economy minister, Michael Glos, called on Moscow to compromise in its feud with Ukraine. "Russia has the presidency of the G8 and therefore has to act responsibly," he said.
As we mentioned on Sunday night, to follow the conversation in the Blogosphere, click here.

UPDATE: More from the Associated Press.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Another blogger makes the connection between natural gas and nuclear energy. And here's a pertinent passage from the Brussels Journal:
It is very dangerous to be dependent on a single energy supplier. This is illustrated by the case of Belgium, which is dependent on French state-controlled companies for 90% of its electricity. This has turned Belgium into a vassal of France and Brussels into a mouthpiece of Paris. If Europe similarly allows the itself to become dependent on Russia, the EU will in a decade from now be the mouthpiece of the Kremlin. To prevent this Europe must diversify its energy resources and seriously consider rebuilding its nuclear power plants. France is 80% nuclear already, which shows that at least Paris wants to be able to confront Moscow on an equal basis. Germany, however, has closed down its nuclear plants.
One more time: Three of the largest suppliers of natural gas going forward are going to be Russia, Iran and Algeria. Plan accordingly. Thanks to TKS for the pointers.

UPDATE: More on the situation in Germany from Deutsche Welle. The Belgravia Dispatch is also looking at the situation.

UPDATE: From yesterday's Financial Times:
According to the EU, two-thirds of its total energy requirements – and three-quarters of its gas – will be imported by 2020. Much of that will be provided by Russia’s state-controlled gas monopoly, Gazprom. A study commissioned by the EU last year warned that, with the arrival of the new eastern European members, EU reliance on Russian gas would increase further.

“The vulnerability of the EU to a disruption of gas supplies is growing, partly because of the increased gas imports in general and partly because of the high dependence on a single source, Russia, of the new member states,” the study found.

“The ability to diversify...is limited due to the fixed infrastructure and the organisation structure of the gas industry in Russia.”

Russia has become increasingly explicit about its intention to use its energy reserves as a foreign policy tool. The question now is whether Europe should work harder to reduce its reliance on imported energy.

One of the few options available to European countries would be to build more nuclear power stations. After the oil shocks of the 1970s, France embarked on a massive nuclear programme, and today, more than three-quarters of its electricity comes from nuclear power.

By contrast, around 20 per cent of Britain’s power is generated with nuclear power and that proportion is set to fall sharply. Unless new nuclear plants are built, Britain says it will rely on gas to generate 70 per cent of its electricity by 2020 – with the vast majority coming from Russia.
FINAL UPDATE: The White House issues a statement.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Kelly L Taylor said…
Re: "Another blogger makes the connection between natural gas and nuclear energy."

The link to the Putin Blinks article is apparently not publicly available? Or at least, not any longer. I couldn't get access last night.
Anonymous said…
"Unless new nuclear plants are built, Britain says it will rely on gas to generate 70 per cent of its electricity by 2020 – with the vast majority coming from Russia."

Wowsers. What a foreign policy club to wield. Don't like what the Brits are saying or doing? Just wave those gas supply contracts under their noses in the midst of a cold European winter. That might have an effect. Nothing like being beholden to another country for the lives of your own citizens.

Popular posts from this blog

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Why Ex-Im Bank Board Nominations Will Turn the Page on a Dysfunctional Chapter in Washington

In our present era of political discord, could Washington agree to support an agency that creates thousands of American jobs by enabling U.S. companies of all sizes to compete in foreign markets? What if that agency generated nearly billions of dollars more in revenue than the cost of its operations and returned that money – $7 billion over the past two decades – to U.S. taxpayers? In fact, that agency, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), was reauthorized by a large majority of Congress in 2015. To be sure, the matter was not without controversy. A bipartisan House coalition resorted to a rarely-used parliamentary maneuver in order to force a vote. But when Congress voted, Ex-Im Bank won a supermajority in the House and a large majority in the Senate. For almost two years, however, Ex-Im Bank has been unable to function fully because a single Senate committee chairman prevented the confirmation of nominees to its Board of Directors. Without a quorum

NEI Praises Connecticut Action in Support of Nuclear Energy

Earlier this week, Connecticut Gov. Dannel P. Malloy signed SB-1501 into law, legislation that puts nuclear energy on an equal footing with other non-emitting sources of energy in the state’s electricity marketplace. “Gov. Malloy and the state legislature deserve praise for their decision to support Dominion’s Millstone Power Station and the 1,500 Connecticut residents who work there," said NEI President and CEO Maria Korsnick. "By opening the door to Millstone having equal access to auctions open to other non-emitting sources of electricity, the state will help preserve $1.5 billion in economic activity, grid resiliency and reliability, and clean air that all residents of the state can enjoy," Korsnick said. Millstone Power Station Korsnick continued, "Connecticut is the third state to re-balance its electricity marketplace, joining New York and Illinois, which took their own legislative paths to preserving nuclear power plants in 2016. Now attention should