Skip to main content

NEI Energy Markets Report (July 31st - August 4th)

Here's a summary of what went on in the energy markets last week:

Electricity prices increased in all parts of the country except for the West. Prices spiked over $200/MWh at the PJM West hub (see pages 1 & 2). Gas prices at the Henry Hub rose $1.45 to $7.97/MMBtu (see page 4).

Nuclear capacity availability was at 97 percent last week. Three units (Fermi 2, D.C. Cook 1 and Watts Bar 1) were each down several days (see pages 2 & 3).

From 2006-2010, the current capacities in the pipeline coming into operation are 44,681 MW for natural gas, 42,402 MW for coal, and 20,049 MW for wind (see page 8).

For the report click here (pdf). It is also located on NEI's Nuclear Statistics webpage.

Technorati tags: , , , , , ,

Comments

Nick said…
What is the 3% difference between electrical demand (3,881.60 BkWh on page 8) and output (4,012,641 on page 5)?

The demand is flat from 2005 to 2006, and the output rose 2.7% !?

It appears that a large amount of planned wind generation shifted from 06 to 07. Any info on that?
David Bradish said…
The first difference is the transmission losses. Output is the generation from the plants and demand is the actual consumption.

The second difference are the sources. EEI (page 5) publishes actual weekly data whereas EIA (page 8) publishes projected data even for months which have already passed.

For the historical data I would look at EEI and not EIA. The purpose of EIA data for this report is to mainly show the projections of prices and demand.

What kind of info are you looking for from the wind shift?

Email me directly if you have further questions.

Popular posts from this blog

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

A Billion Miles Under Nuclear Energy (Updated)

And the winner is…Cassini-Huygens, in triple overtime.

The spaceship conceived in 1982 and launched fifteen years later, will crash into Saturn on September 15, after a mission of 19 years and 355 days, powered by the audacity and technical prowess of scientists and engineers from 17 different countries, and 72 pounds of plutonium.

The mission was so successful that it was extended three times; it was intended to last only until 2008.

Since April, the ship has been continuing to orbit Saturn, swinging through the 1,500-mile gap between the planet and its rings, an area not previously explored. This is a good maneuver for a spaceship nearing the end of its mission, since colliding with a rock could end things early.

Cassini will dive a little deeper and plunge toward Saturn’s surface, where it will transmit data until it burns up in the planet’s atmosphere. The radio signal will arrive here early Friday morning, Eastern time. A NASA video explains.

In the years since Cassini has launc…