Skip to main content

A Bright Electric Powered Future for the Car

By Eric McErlain

After taking a hard look at the all-electric Tesla Roadster, Demon Speeding is conjuring up a hopeful, and fun, vision for the future of the automobile:
Voltage. Amps. Kilowatts. Zero Emissions. Lithium Ion. I see parking garages and parking lots of work places being equipped with plugs. I see gas stations offering “quick change” battery exchanges similar to the way one could exchange a propane tank today. I see the US taking a new interest in the development and construction of new nuclear power plants. I see electricity rates per kilowatt hour electricity rate falling to all-time lows. I see new racing leagues, in the spirit of Formula 1, Indy, Cart and NASCAR, being launched with all-electric vehicles. I see light at the end of the tunnel for a lifelong “gear-head”.
Sounds great to me. Zoom zoom!
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
If you've got a spare one hundred grand to throw around, I guess this is your car. But until the price drops to something less than a lifetime's earnings for ordinary folks, it will remain a playtoy for actors and corporate CEOs (as listed on the "ownership" section of the entry).
April 11, 2007 at 1:23 PM
Stewart Peterson said…
All cars were once playthings for the rich.

Electric cars would probably benefit more from nuclear power than you might think as a near-100% nuclear grid would allow non-metered electricity. And yes, we can get there--100% of electricity coming from nuclear energy (say 30% LWR, 18% HWR, 50% LMFBR, 2% experimental reactors like MSRs and PBMRs) is no less diverse than 100% coming from chemical energy (say 50% coal, 30% oil, 15% gas, 5% other gases).
April 11, 2007 at 5:43 PM
Anonymous said…
+-Cars Rule!

The final transition to the electric everything will be done once the nuclear fusion reactor starts working. Hope we can see it in our life ;)

[+-]Everything!

Electric Emoticon Announcement
April 11, 2007 at 7:47 PM
Ace said…
The price of this car and similar offerings should be dramatically reduced in the future. As in our blog Demon Speeding.., "But like any other new technology, the relative high cost is completely understandable. And if there is any one thing technological innovations have taught us over the past 2-3 decades, it’s that when technology is in high demand it has a tendency to do two things: improve rapidly and decrease in cost equally so. Anyone who bought a CD player in the mid 80’s, a DVD player in the mid 90’s, a computer in 2000 or a digital camera last month can attest to this."
April 12, 2007 at 8:50 AM
Ace said…
We definitely need to start building new nuclear power stations. The ones that are operating today are 1950's technology, with the advancements in nuclear technology not only will the new power stations be able to generate electricity they will also be able to produce hydrogen giving us another alternative to fuel cars, homes and all sorts of electronic devices.
April 12, 2007 at 8:55 AM
Anonymous said…
Yes, I understand that automobiles were once the exclusive playthings of the wealthy. That's why I said the price of this model will have to come down to something comparable to what we pay now for gasoline-powered vehicles if it is going to gain acceptance in the marketplace. It took a Henry Ford to do that in the early years of the auto industry. Is there someone out there who can do likewise with this technology?

The range issue must also be addressed, or the problem of charging time. I prefer to take my car on vacation. It is too expensive for my family to fly and then rent a car for a couple of weeks. We need our own vehicle. Depending on where we go, it might be anywhere from 600 to 1100 miles to our destination one way. Now I can "recharge" my gasoline burner at the pump in five minutes and be on my way for another 500 miles. Can something like that ever be hoped for from electric technology?
April 13, 2007 at 11:12 AM
Royce Penstinger said…
Do your homework...the folks at Tesla know the lies that are the Nuclear Renaissance, do not buy into your lies that nuclear is the great Green Earthmother of the hydrogen economy.
April 15, 2007 at 12:26 AM
RemyC said…
Back OFF! Tesla Motors is selling their roadster with a residential PV system to charge the car! 330 green celebrities have already bought the car so far, ALL of them ANTI-nuclear... By this time next year, every other car on Rodeo drive will be an electric car.. Your industry is DEAD on arrival. Indian Point is down for the count... give it up already! Find yourselves honest work.
April 15, 2007 at 9:45 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more