Skip to main content

Gov. Romney on Nuclear Energy

Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney was in the Washington suburbs yesterday to give a speech to the Northern Virginia Technology Council. During a post-speech Q&A, the Governor was asked a question about the future viability of nuclear energy:
"I'm afraid building a nuclear power plant in our country today would require us first to hire the French to show us how to do it because they've been building 'em and we haven't,"
For more, including video, click here. A couple of points:
  • While a new nuclear power plant hasn't been built in the U.S. in a few decades, both General Electric and Westinghouse have been building them overseas in the interim, gaining valuable construction experience, especially in Asia.
  • While French nuclear giant AREVA is a leader in the industry, it is important to note that its reactor technology is essentially built on a Westinghouse design.
For more facts on new nuclear plant construction, click here. For more on advanced reactor designs, click here.

Comments

Rod Adams said…
It is also important to note that the French have also had a building hiatus. Their last completed plants in France were in 2000, which means that their construction skills have also begun to atrophy.

Of course, they have had a strong presence in the component replacement market, but that is a different skill set from starting up a new project.
Kevin McCoy said…
When Mr. Romney says "I'm afraid" is he expressing a dislike for nuclear or for France? Or are we just overanalyzing his words?

Perhap he is just unaware that, like it or not, nuclear companies are global in scope. A couple of AREVA's recent jobs illustrate that fact: reactor vessel heads were forged in Japan, machined in France, transported on a Russian plane, and installed in a U.S. nuclear plant.

I would be as pleased as anyone else if the forging and machining could be done in the U.S., but national pride should not stand in the way of national progress.
Anonymous said…
Romney lived for two years in France and speaks French fluently, so he probably has a greater appreciation for French capabilities than the average American.
D. Walters said…
Of course the French have also started building plants too, in Finland, and, the one they will build in Flamesville(sp?). In way, Areva is very well positioned since they are so well integrated vertically in the industry, literally top to bottom.

David Walters
Anonymous said…
Some of the hiatus may be attributed to gearing up for the next generation of plants. My understanding is that the French are following an evolutionary process that will build upon their experience with light water plants. This makes sense. It is where Western expertise lies. We'd be wise to consider such an approach.
Joffan said…
Kevin:
I read Romney's words ("I'm afraid...") as expressing regret for his preception of a skills gap in the US.

nada:
Flamesville is of course Calgary, Alberta, Canada. I think you mean Flamenville.

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin