Skip to main content

Nuclear Bloggers Discuss the Fukushima Accident

By

Rod Adams hosted five other pro-nuclear folks on his Atomic show to discuss the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. The guests on the show include:

Stop by to hear about their experiences from last week and thoughts about the accident.

As well, be sure to check out Brave New Climate which has been following the events all week and has an open discussion thread for today that’s up to 90 plus comments.

Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
You can't make a nuclear plant perfectly safe, only safer. Accidents will happen, and the real solution is providing better protection then FEMA telling people to duct tape and use plastic sheets to seal themselves in a room.

There is a tested and patented technology that would provide complete protection, only the Feds and industry isn't paying attention to its inventor and helping fund his product to production:

http://www.rbcshield.com

Nuclear technology isn't going away anytime, and neither is the limit to what we can anticipate.

People need to demand these tiles be made available for purchase so they can protect themselves from the aftermath of radiological, biological, or chemical accidents or attacks.

It only makes sense.
March 21, 2011 at 2:57 PM
Anonymous said…
Does your company make these tiles?
March 22, 2011 at 1:09 PM
David Bradish said…
NEI doesn't make these tiles, the first comment is borderline spam but somewhat applicable.
March 22, 2011 at 1:15 PM
Anonymous said…
Thank you David. my question was directed to the poster on the tiles, not to NEI.
March 23, 2011 at 11:34 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fluor Invests in NuScale

By
You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...
1 comment
Read more

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more