Skip to main content

Friday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site:

NRC, Industry Agree on Near-Term Actions at U.S. Reactors

October 7, 2011

Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues

  • U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissioner Gregory Jaczko this week said the agency’s near-term priorities to supplement safety and emergency response at America’s nuclear energy facilities include revising existing rules to cover emergency preparedness at multi-reactor facilities and used nuclear fuel pool monitoring. A video of Jaczko’s remarks is available on the National Journal’s website. The nuclear energy industry agrees with the majority of issues identified for near-term action.
  • Tokyo Electric Power Co. said radiation is not suspected in the death an employee who became ill at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear energy facility and later died. TEPCO said it could not reveal the cause of death until authorities issued a death certificate. Two other Fukushima workers have died since stabilization efforts began at the Japanese reactor, neither from radiation exposure.
  • A Japanese government panel reviewing TEPCO’s finances said the utility is expected to pay $13.2 billion through March 2012 in compensation for damages and then $11.6 billion annually. The panel did not say how long the payments might continue. Additionally, the panel said TEPCO will have to cut 7,400 jobs and reduce costs by $32.5 billion over the next 10 years. The Japanese government will use the panel’s findings to help craft a plan for the company’s financial stability.
  • TEPCO started sprinkling decontaminated water on the premises of the Fukushima nuclear power plant, wetting down trees that been cut down in order to reduce the risk of fire. TEPCO says it now has stored 17,000 tons of such water, collected from two reactor turbine buildings and cleaned of salt and radioactive substances. TEPCO will continue to use about 100 tons of the water each day within the facility grounds.
  • The Hokuriku Electric Power Co. has started building a reinforced concrete seawall at its plant in west-central Japan. The project is in response to a government directive to enhance preparedness against tsunami damage at nuclear energy facilities. Workers at the facility also will install an extra pump to cool reactors and a power source to operate a valve for venting steam from containment.
  • Finland is the first country to announce plans for a new nuclear energy facility since the accident in Japan. Finnish nuclear power consortium Fennovoima said it would build a reactor in Pyhajoki in Northern Finland. Authorities said the new facility will help the country reduce its use of Russian natural gas and further support the forestry and metals industries.

Upcoming Events

The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will hold its second hearing on the NRC’s post-Fukushima activities Nov. 3.

Comments

Anonymous said…
All three fossil fuels are in terrible shape. Oil has peaked worldwide, and exports are down from 44 million barrels a day in 2005 to just 38 million barrels a day today, and falling fast. And more of those declining exports are going to China and India. In the U.S., Eurozone and Japan, per capita oil consumption is down 10% since 2006. Coal and natural gas, amazingly, are in just as bad shape!

http://www.energybulletin.net/stories/2011-05-17/debunking-shale-gale

http://www.energybulletin.net/node/29919

http://www.energybulletin.net/stories/2011-05-13/peak-coal-year

It really is nuclear or nothing!

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …