Skip to main content

Friday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site:

NRC, Industry Agree on Near-Term Actions at U.S. Reactors

October 7, 2011

Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues

  • U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissioner Gregory Jaczko this week said the agency’s near-term priorities to supplement safety and emergency response at America’s nuclear energy facilities include revising existing rules to cover emergency preparedness at multi-reactor facilities and used nuclear fuel pool monitoring. A video of Jaczko’s remarks is available on the National Journal’s website. The nuclear energy industry agrees with the majority of issues identified for near-term action.
  • Tokyo Electric Power Co. said radiation is not suspected in the death an employee who became ill at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear energy facility and later died. TEPCO said it could not reveal the cause of death until authorities issued a death certificate. Two other Fukushima workers have died since stabilization efforts began at the Japanese reactor, neither from radiation exposure.
  • A Japanese government panel reviewing TEPCO’s finances said the utility is expected to pay $13.2 billion through March 2012 in compensation for damages and then $11.6 billion annually. The panel did not say how long the payments might continue. Additionally, the panel said TEPCO will have to cut 7,400 jobs and reduce costs by $32.5 billion over the next 10 years. The Japanese government will use the panel’s findings to help craft a plan for the company’s financial stability.
  • TEPCO started sprinkling decontaminated water on the premises of the Fukushima nuclear power plant, wetting down trees that been cut down in order to reduce the risk of fire. TEPCO says it now has stored 17,000 tons of such water, collected from two reactor turbine buildings and cleaned of salt and radioactive substances. TEPCO will continue to use about 100 tons of the water each day within the facility grounds.
  • The Hokuriku Electric Power Co. has started building a reinforced concrete seawall at its plant in west-central Japan. The project is in response to a government directive to enhance preparedness against tsunami damage at nuclear energy facilities. Workers at the facility also will install an extra pump to cool reactors and a power source to operate a valve for venting steam from containment.
  • Finland is the first country to announce plans for a new nuclear energy facility since the accident in Japan. Finnish nuclear power consortium Fennovoima said it would build a reactor in Pyhajoki in Northern Finland. Authorities said the new facility will help the country reduce its use of Russian natural gas and further support the forestry and metals industries.

Upcoming Events

The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will hold its second hearing on the NRC’s post-Fukushima activities Nov. 3.

Comments

Anonymous said…
All three fossil fuels are in terrible shape. Oil has peaked worldwide, and exports are down from 44 million barrels a day in 2005 to just 38 million barrels a day today, and falling fast. And more of those declining exports are going to China and India. In the U.S., Eurozone and Japan, per capita oil consumption is down 10% since 2006. Coal and natural gas, amazingly, are in just as bad shape!

http://www.energybulletin.net/stories/2011-05-17/debunking-shale-gale

http://www.energybulletin.net/node/29919

http://www.energybulletin.net/stories/2011-05-13/peak-coal-year

It really is nuclear or nothing!

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin