Skip to main content

Monday Update

By

From NEI’s Japan micro-site:

Japan’s Government to Pay for Cleanup of Lower Levels of Contamination

October 3, 2011

Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues

  • Goshi Hosono, Japan’s cabinet minister for nuclear crisis management, told the governor of Fukushima prefecture that the government would provide financial and technical assistance to clean up radioactive contamination in towns where radiation levels are between 100 and 500 millirem per year. Prior to Hosono’s statement, it was not clear whether towns with those levels of contamination would have to pay for their own decontamination.
  • A Japanese government advisory panel is to report to Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda today on the financial condition of Tokyo Electric Power Co., with a view to the company’s ability to pay compensation claims to people affected by the Fukushima Daiichi accident. The report is expected to ask TEPCO to consider cutting its costs before it raises utility fees. The panel also notes that the company‘s financial viability will remain difficult unless its other nuclear energy facilities restart. The government is expected to provide financial assistance to the company, in which case it will be required to follow the government’s restructuring plan.

Media Highlights

  • The Japanese government has found extremely small quantities of plutonium as far as 28 miles from the Fukushima nuclear facility, UPI reports. The government recommends that decontamination efforts concentrate on radioactive cesium instead.
  • Reuters notes that with last month’s shutdown of two more Japanese nuclear reactors for inspection, there are now only 11 operating nuclear facilities in the country, bringing Japan down to 20 percent of its pre-Fukushima nuclear generating capacity.
  • The Fukushima prefectural government’s detailed radiation health survey of all 2 million-plus residents of the prefecture is discussed in an article by the National Institutes of Health. Researchers plan to combine activity logs for each resident with maps plotting daily radiation levels to estimate the external radiation dose each person may have received in the first four months after the March 11 accident.

Upcoming Events

  • Exelon Generation Co. Chief Operating Officer Charles Pardee will brief the U.S. Energy Association’s energy supply forum Oct. 4 on safety and preparedness issues at America’s nuclear energy facilities.
  • U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Gregory Jaczko will speak at a National Journal event Oct. 5 on the global implications of the Japan nuclear accident.
  • The NRC commissioners will be briefed in a public meeting Oct. 11 on prioritization of long-term recommendations from its Japan task force. The briefing will be webcast
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more