Skip to main content

Australia Nuclear Update

Australia does not have any nuclear power reactors, and it is all too easy for the nuclear industry to consider it as an important but sleepy source of uranium. It is time to take another look.

For over 20 years, Australia has had a “three-mines policy”: only three mines (Beverley, Olympic Dam, and Ranger) are licensed to mine uranium. The policy was instituted by the Australian Labor Party in response to antinuclear sentiment.

But last week, the Australian Federal government, under opposition leader John Howard, announced that it would take responsibility for licensing new mines in the Northern Territory. Most of Australia’s area is administered by state governments, and the Federal government does not have the constitutional authority to license mines in the states, but the legal status of the Northern Territory is different.

Over the weekend, there was more news that Australia had been in talks with China about uranium exports. And as noted here by Duncan Bell, Australian Minister of Science Brendan Nelson has just today strengthened his support for nuclear power.

Our friends down under may not have any power reactors today, but look for them to play an important role in the nuclear renaissance.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Rod Adams said…
Australia has a long history of organized anti-nuclear activity, but it is important to understand the basis for that movement.

The leaders in the 1970s were unions, led by railroad unions. That is no surprise, coal transportation represents a large portion of the rail freight traffic in Australia.

It is no surprise that activity to limit supplies of uranium continue - Australia is the world's largest exporter of coal, with nearly 30% of the world trade in the material. This trade netted exporters a bit more than $13 Billion in 2004.

Uranium miners themselves have economic reasons to limit exploration and mining activity. In the past three years, the world price of uranium has trippled from about $10 per pound to nearly $30 per pound. This increase would not be supportable if new supplies were allowed to be developed without restriction.

Follow the money, find the anti-nuclear support.

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin