The NEI Morning Clip File

Here are some of the news clips we're reading at NEI this morning. South Carolina has aspirations to become a leader in the hydrogen fuel market, but two reports say that the state will need to boost its nuclear energy program to accomplish this:

The state also should set as its No. 1 priority securing the billion-dollar-plus federal investment to ensure the next nuclear reactor is located at SRS. That will require the united support of the stateÂ’s congressional delegation, the report states. In the next two decades, the commercial-scale reactor probably will be the single largest hydrogen economy investment in the United States. SRS would be an ideal location for a commercial, as well as a prototype reactor, the Concurrent Technologies report said.

U.S. Rep. Gresham Barrett, R-S.C., who represents the Aiken area, recently said he is confident South Carolina will be a finalist to be the site for the next nuclear reactor being planned by NuStart, a consortium that includes Duke Energy, Progress Energy and Southern Co.

Barrett said he thinks it is extremely likely the reactor ultimately will be built at SRS.

Concurrent Technologies said S.C. leaders should seek proposals for a nuclear energy park at the Savannah River Site to host commercial nuclear power plants capable of producing electricity, as well as hydrogen for the new hydrogen economy. And South Carolina should get behind a group of 17 Southeastern universities, including USC and Clemson, to win Department of Energy funding for a high-temperature research reactor at SRS, the report states.

Hydrogen is the most common element on earth, but isolating it for use as fuel requires significant energy resources.

American chemist Daniel Nocera cited some alarming conclusions about our future energy needs in his endeavor to meet them:

A U.S. chemist is trying to determine how the world will produce enough energy to supply 9 billion people by mid-century -- and whether that can be done without pumping off-the-charts amounts of carbon dioxide into the air.

Daniel Nocera, 48, is working to achieve an old, elusive dream: using the bountiful energy in sunlight to split water into its basic components, hydrogen and oxygen. The elements could then be used to supply clean-running fuel cells or new kinds of machinery. Or the energy created from the reaction itself, as atomic bonds are severed and re-formed, might be harnessed and stored.

...Nocera cites a calculation by Caltech chemist Nathan Lewis that power demands in 2050 will be so great that just to keep carbon dioxide emissions at twice preindustrial levels, a nuclear plant would have to be built every two days. There's not enough room on the planet's surface for other widely touted solutions such as wind and biomass to have much impact.

Like many others, Constellation Energy Group believes that nuclear energy is going to make a comeback:

Executives at Constellation Energy Group Inc., which has acquired two nuclear power plants over the past four years, believe nuclear energy is on the verge of a comeback.

Mayo A. Shattuck III, Constellation's chief executive, said rising natural gas prices, dependence on foreign energy, plus environmental concerns about greenhouse gas emissions and pollution from burning coal make nuclear power a logical option.

"At the end of the day, we really don't have the choice but to invest in a new generation of nuclear" plants, said Shattuck, who called nuclear power "efficient and environmentally friendly."

In a blog post earlier today, Rod Adams explained how the increasing cost of oil, coal and natural gas makes nuclear energy a much more feasible solution:

There is plenty of available capacity to increase energy output from uranium, especially if the people in the groups organized to stop its growth learn how limited the competitors are. It is time to start a world wide effort to build new nuclear power plants.

Come back this afternoon for more news from the NEI Clip File.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Environment, Energy, Politics, Technology, Economics

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog