Skip to main content

Making the Connection Between Energy and American Manufacturing

By Eric McErlain
This morning at a meeting in Virignia, NEI President and CEO Skip Bowman addressed the Council of Manufacturing Associations, an associated organization of the National Association of Manufacturers, and had this to say about the link between affordable electricity and economic growth:
I know everyone in this room understands that our manufacturing and our economy is inextricably linked to affordable, abundant electricity.

The United States is using more and more of its energy in the form of electricity and this trend will continue. Since 1973, U.S. GDP has grown by 150 percent. Electricity consumption increased by 96 percent. Overall energy use has gone up, too, but only by about one-third. It doesn’t take a math whiz to conclude that American manufacturing and the electric power industry must grow in harmony.

Electric power sales represent 3 to 4 percent of our gross domestic product. But the other 96 to 97 percent of our $11-trillion-a-year economy depends on that 3 to 4 percent.

We cannot afford to gamble with something as fundamental as electricity supply, and the biggest problem we face with nuclear energy is not having enough of it.


Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Stewart Peterson said…
The fundamental notion that nuclear energy is the only long-term way to generate large amounts of electricity is not disputed. See http://niof.blogspot.com/2005/07/anti-nuclear-quote-of-day_29.html and http://www.sierraclub.org/policy/conservation/nuc-power.asp
August 4, 2005 at 2:30 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

By
Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...
Post a Comment
Read more