Skip to main content

Washington Times: Utilities Need to Take Advantage and Build New Nuclear

By Eric McErlain
In this morning's edition of the Washington Times, the newspaper has come out strongly in favor of expanding the use of nuclear energy:
To enhance America's national security and energy security over the long term, it is imperative that the United States expand its use of nuclear power. To this end, it is encouraging that the nuclear power industry has enthusiastically welcomed the incentives contained in the energy bill that Congress has just approved.
In turn, the editorial also echoed a concern we shared the other day, that many of the foreign sources of natural gas -- a fossil fuel that America has grown too reliant on -- come from regimes as unstable as the ones that provide our economy with oil today:
As it happens, Russia and the Middle East (particularly Iran and Qatar) control nearly 70 percent of the world's proven reserves of natural gas, whose electric-power-generating price has increased from $2 per thousand cubic feet in 1995 to nearly $7 this year. Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin has signaled his intention to cartelize the natural-gas market in the same way OPEC has established a cartel for oil. In an era when national security is inextricably linked to energy security, it would be counterproductive for the United States to become overly dependent on overseas natural gas, whose supply is controlled by nations that do not have America's best interests at heart.
If you look at this graph from the State Department, you'll find that Iran flares about 10 percent of its natural gas supply every year -- enought to generate 4,000 megawatts of power continuously. Thanks to the View from Benambra for the pointer.

And in conclusion:
Considering the national-security implications related to our dependence on imported oil today and imported natural gas in the future, these incentives are well worth their nominal cost. Other industrialized nations prudently use nuclear-power to generate much higher percentages of electricity: France, 78 percent; Sweden, 50 percent; South Korea, 40 percent; Germany, 28 percent; and Japan, 25 percent. The nuclear power industry should take advantage of the incentives so that the United States can join those nations.
Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

By
You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...
1 comment
Read more

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

By
Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...
Post a Comment
Read more