Skip to main content

Resolutions Supporting New Plants

City, county, and state governments have passed resolutions supporting construction of new nuclear power plants within their limits for a variety of reasons, including that nuclear plants are more environmentally friendly than other options, and that construction and operation would stimulate economic development and spur job growth.

The Calvert County, Md., Board of Commissioners is among the spate of groups supporting site selection by the NuStart Energy Development LLC Consortium. David Hale, president of the board of commissioners, today laid out the board's reasons for unanimously passing a resolution supporting a new reactor at the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant in Lusby, Md. Hale outlines why the NuStart consortium has been so enthusiastically welcomed by each of the six finalist states. (In fact, he pretty much sums up what we've been saying all along here at NEI Nuclear Notes.) Here's what he had to say:

Many of the decisions we make are difficult; many take months, even years. But the decision to stand before the NuStart Team today was simple, uncomplicated and easy. Nuclear energy is clean and reliable and, from a local perspective, there is virtually no opposition to this expansion.

From a national perspective, keeping the nuclear option open is a critical piece of our country's energy strategy. By having a diverse supply of electricity-generating options we can lessen our dependence on foreign energy sources and reduce our vulnerability to price spikes and supply interruptions associated with any one type of fuel.

From a local perspective, I believe that selecting Calvert Cliffs as an expansion site is critical. Calvert Cliffs is more than just a large taxpayer and employer, they are a proven community member with a remarkable safety record, a steward of the environment and continued supporter of our local business community. This plant has been the driving force that allowed Calvert to obtain a level of service that continues to increase the quality of life for our citizens. Before Calvert Cliffs, Calvert County was one of the poorest counties in the State of Maryland. The plant brought Calvert new opportunities, including significant increases in employment and tax revenue, which meant new schools, parks, staff and attractions.

Nuclear energy has perhaps the lowest impact on the environment — including air, land, water and wildlife — of any energy source, because it does not emit harmful gases, isolates its waste from the environment and requires less area to produce the same amount of electricity as other sources. ... The fact is, without nuclear energy, the vast amounts of future electricity needs would be produced by coal or other fossil fuels. The increases in pollution and greenhouse gas emissions would be significant, contradicting all arguments for clean air.

In fact, leading environmentalists, including [Patrick Moore,] the founder of Greenpeace and the former chairman of Friends of the Earth, have endorsed nuclear energy as the only large-scale, non-emitting, affordable energy source that can address both global warming and sustainable development.

... Regardless of which final sites are selected as part of this process it is important to remember that nuclear energy is critical to our country’s ability to provide clean, safe and reliable energy while balancing our responsibility to the environment.

We fully support the selection of Calvert Cliffs for a third nuclear reactor and stand ready – along with the State of Maryland – to negotiate a comprehensive incentive package to ensure that we adequately and appropriately address the needs and concerns of NuStart Energy Development in this project.
Visit NEI's public Web site to view each of the seven resolutions passed to date.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin