Skip to main content

Mangano, The Nation, Reactors & Racism

The Nation printed this piece from Mr. Joseph Mangano, titled Reactors & Racism. I wanted to find out more information about the publishers, and found this:
The Nation will not be the organ of any party, sect, or body. It will, on the contrary, make an earnest effort to bring to the discussion of political and social questions a really critical spirit, and to wage war upon the vices of violence, exaggeration, and misrepresentation by which so much of the political writing of the day is marred.
-- from The Nation's founding prospectus, 1865
I find this quite reassuring, because I can now be confident they will appreciate some light shed upon the vices of exaggeration and misrepresentation found in Mr. Mangano's creative writing.

Let me first state that I was there at the public meeting on June 28 in Port Gibson, Mississippi. So you can understand how I may refute Mr. Mangano's claim:
Numerous local residents showed up at several public meetings, including one on June 28 in Port Gibson, to decry the expansion.
In fact, of 18 speakers on June 28 (not counting those who traveled with me), I heard 2 local people decry the nuclear expansion. Please don't think the meeting was poorly attended, either. An overflow room was set up with a video feed, because the planned meeting room would not hold the 160 people who wanted to be in attendance. Nor did the meeting end before everyone had an opportunity to speak. Before closing the meeting, the NRC moderator asked if anyone who hadn't signed up had comments they wished to share. No one did. For an eyewitness account, read what Michael Stuart wrote here.

But what Mr. Mangano won't tell you is that the African American Environmentalist Association supports expanded nuclear power, because clean air and inexpensive power are both good for minority communities. Had he been there that evening, or read about what happened, he would know that organization spoke in support of a new reactor in Port Gibson.

During my trip, I was approached by people of all races thanking me for my support of nuclear expansion in Mississippi. During my visit, I found everyone to be informed, hospitable, and observant to all particulars that could affect their community. The people I met sought new development and resources for their community - an employer, as well as a partner and investor in local growth and development.

I would suggest instead that Mr. Mangano go to Port Gibson and listen to what the community has to say about they want for their future. Otherwise, with his kind of help, only the affluent communities will get the sort of economic development that so many are desperate to have to improve their resources, educational opportunities, and standard of living.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Norris McDonald said…
I am insulted by the misuse of the racism charge. And dismissing the massive black support, particularly political and organizations in Port Gibson and Claiborne County, adds injury to insult.
Anonymous said…
I'm shocked, absolutely shocked, to think that someone from The Nation would write something that was misleading for their own political ends.

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...