Australia Nuclear Update

Here's an interesting news item out of New South Wales:

SCRAMBLING to catch up on years of inadequate infrastructure planning, the NSW Government gave the go-ahead yesterday for the state's biggest privately funded power station.

The 400 megawatt, $350million plant will be one of two gas-fired stations the Government will race to have built before a forecast energy crunch takes hold on the state.

But even as Premier Morris Iemma announced the new electricity plants, he said he could not guarantee there would be no blackouts this summer.

In many ways, Australia is in the same boat the U.S. is when it comes to electrical generation: Decades of paying attention to short-term needs have led us to neglect long-term planning in the electrical sector resulting in a pending shortage of baseload power generation.

What we have here is not an energy crisis per se, but rather an energy investment crisis -- something NEI Chairman and CEO Skip Bowman first pointed out in a speech he gave last April in San Antonio.

Later in the story, I tripped over this paragraph:

While former NSW premier Bob Carr had called for a debate on nuclear power, Mr Iemma has rejected nuclear generation outright, forcing him into more greenhouse-unfriendly options.

But if Australia did allow new nuclear to go forward, it could displace natural gas in electric power generation, and free up supply for the home heating and industrial markets.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Environment Energy, Politics, Technology, Economics, Australia

Comments

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog