Australia Nuclear Update

Here's an interesting news item out of New South Wales:

SCRAMBLING to catch up on years of inadequate infrastructure planning, the NSW Government gave the go-ahead yesterday for the state's biggest privately funded power station.

The 400 megawatt, $350million plant will be one of two gas-fired stations the Government will race to have built before a forecast energy crunch takes hold on the state.

But even as Premier Morris Iemma announced the new electricity plants, he said he could not guarantee there would be no blackouts this summer.

In many ways, Australia is in the same boat the U.S. is when it comes to electrical generation: Decades of paying attention to short-term needs have led us to neglect long-term planning in the electrical sector resulting in a pending shortage of baseload power generation.

What we have here is not an energy crisis per se, but rather an energy investment crisis -- something NEI Chairman and CEO Skip Bowman first pointed out in a speech he gave last April in San Antonio.

Later in the story, I tripped over this paragraph:

While former NSW premier Bob Carr had called for a debate on nuclear power, Mr Iemma has rejected nuclear generation outright, forcing him into more greenhouse-unfriendly options.

But if Australia did allow new nuclear to go forward, it could displace natural gas in electric power generation, and free up supply for the home heating and industrial markets.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Environment Energy, Politics, Technology, Economics, Australia

Comments

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog