Skip to main content

Nuclear Perspectives from Climate Change Conference

By Eric McErlain
Earlier this week, my colleague Mary Quillian attended a conference in New York City sponsored by Resources for the Future concerning business perspectives on climate change. She dashed a short note off to me this morning that I wanted to share:
Not surprisingly, nuclear was mentioned several times.

The gentleman from GE said that his company see nuclear as a significant part of the solution. BP is approaching climate change by entering businesses with technologies that fit into one of the “wedges” that will lead to atmospheric CO2 stabilization. BP is not yet building a new nuclear plant, but they did acknowledge nuclear is one of the wedges. Even the Europeans brought in to discuss the EU CO2 emissions trading program mentioned that nuclear strategy was being reconsidered in several European countries.
For more on BP's plans for low carbon energy generation, read this speech from earlier this week by Vivienne Cox, BP's Chief Executive Gas, Power & Renewables. And earlier this week, ABC News did a feature on the EU CO2 emissions trading program. To visit GE Nuclear click here. And congrats to the team at GE Nuclear on today's news from NRC.

Back to Mary's note:
Perhaps the most significant discussion of nuclear energy was in the closing remarks from Jim Rogers, CEO of Cinergy Corp. He said that one of the main reasons Cinergy was merging with Duke was Duke’s fleet of nuclear power plants and its nuclear operations know-how. Cinergy has no nuclear power plants.

Further, Rogers, who thinks mandatory controls on CO2 are inevitable and the country should implement them sooner rather than later, saw irony in the fact that Senator Reid of Nevada is supportive enacting national climate change policy but he is standing in the way of getting Yucca Mountain built.

It was clear at this conference that the business community realizes nuclear energy is going to be part of any serious program to address climate change.
Earlier this year, Duke Energy CEO Paul Anderson called for the imposition of a carbon tax. For the latest on the Duke/Cinergy merger, click here.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fluor Invests in NuScale

By
You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...
1 comment
Read more

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more