Skip to main content

Nuclear Perspectives from Climate Change Conference

By Eric McErlain
Earlier this week, my colleague Mary Quillian attended a conference in New York City sponsored by Resources for the Future concerning business perspectives on climate change. She dashed a short note off to me this morning that I wanted to share:
Not surprisingly, nuclear was mentioned several times.

The gentleman from GE said that his company see nuclear as a significant part of the solution. BP is approaching climate change by entering businesses with technologies that fit into one of the “wedges” that will lead to atmospheric CO2 stabilization. BP is not yet building a new nuclear plant, but they did acknowledge nuclear is one of the wedges. Even the Europeans brought in to discuss the EU CO2 emissions trading program mentioned that nuclear strategy was being reconsidered in several European countries.
For more on BP's plans for low carbon energy generation, read this speech from earlier this week by Vivienne Cox, BP's Chief Executive Gas, Power & Renewables. And earlier this week, ABC News did a feature on the EU CO2 emissions trading program. To visit GE Nuclear click here. And congrats to the team at GE Nuclear on today's news from NRC.

Back to Mary's note:
Perhaps the most significant discussion of nuclear energy was in the closing remarks from Jim Rogers, CEO of Cinergy Corp. He said that one of the main reasons Cinergy was merging with Duke was Duke’s fleet of nuclear power plants and its nuclear operations know-how. Cinergy has no nuclear power plants.

Further, Rogers, who thinks mandatory controls on CO2 are inevitable and the country should implement them sooner rather than later, saw irony in the fact that Senator Reid of Nevada is supportive enacting national climate change policy but he is standing in the way of getting Yucca Mountain built.

It was clear at this conference that the business community realizes nuclear energy is going to be part of any serious program to address climate change.
Earlier this year, Duke Energy CEO Paul Anderson called for the imposition of a carbon tax. For the latest on the Duke/Cinergy merger, click here.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more