Skip to main content

On the Trail of the "Tooth Fairy"

Tuesday's edition of the Brattleboro Reformer carried a story that Joseph Mangano, head of the Radiation and Public Health Project, better known as the "Tooth Fairy" project, has parachuted into Vermont with his shaky science in order to shake things up around Vermont Yankee.

For those who aren't familiar with his schtick, Mangano is determined to demonstrate a link between Strontium 90 (Sr-90), nuclear plants and childhood cancer by analyzing the levels of Sr-90 found in baby teeth.

What the Brattleboro reporter neglects to mention, is that Mangano has been taking his public health snake oil show on the road for some time now. And whenever real scientists debunk his research findings, Mangano just goes to another city or town hoping that nobody follows his trail.

Earlier this year when CNN did a feature on Mangano, we had this to say:
Consistently, the NRC has found no appreciable changes from background radiation near nuclear plants. In all, eight state departments of health have investigated Mangano's claims, and all eight states (Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Minnesota and Michigan) refused to validate them.
Just as damaging was this determination published by the New Jersey Commission on Radiation Protection in February 2004:
The Commission is of the opinion that "Radioactive Strontium-90 in Baby Teeth of New Jersey Children and the Link with Cancer: A Special Report," is a flawed report, with substantial errors in methodology and invalid statistics. As a result, any information gathered through this project would not stand up to the scrutiny of the scientific community. There is also no evidence to support the allegation that the State of New Jersey has a problem with the release of Sr-90 into the environment from nuclear generating plants: more than 30 years of environmental monitoring data refute this.
All this information is relatively easy to find, including our earlier entry on Mangano, which shows up in the first ten Goggle search results when you search on his name and "tooth fairy".

For me, this issue is a whole lot like the accusations that Helen Caldicott makes against the nuclear industry. And the response always has to be the same: To counter the hysteria with sound science whenever it gets repeated.

For more on the "Tooth Fairy" issue from the NEI archives, click here and here.

UPDATE: In other news, Entergy Nuclear, the owner of Vermont Yankee, has applied to NRC for renewal of the plant's license, as well as the license for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Well, the Tooth Fairy Project is a subset of RPHP, but I nitpick.

My September 30 Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day covered it. An interesting comment from an anti-nuclear activist can be found near the end.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

Why Nuclear Plant Closures Are a Crisis for Small Town USA

Nuclear plants occupy an unusual spot in the towns where they operate: integral but so much in the background that they may seem almost invisible. But when they close, it can be like the earth shifting underfoot.

Lohud.com, the Gannett newspaper that covers the Lower Hudson Valley in New York, took a look around at the experience of towns where reactors have closed, because the Indian Point reactors in Buchanan are scheduled to be shut down under an agreement with Gov. Mario Cuomo.


From sea to shining sea, it was dismal. It wasn’t just the plant employees who were hurt. The losses of hundreds of jobs, tens of millions of dollars in payrolls and millions in property taxes depressed whole towns and surrounding areas. For example:

Vernon, Vermont, home to Vermont Yankee for more than 40 years, had to cut its municipal budget in half. The town closed its police department and let the county take over; the youth sports teams lost their volunteer coaches, and Vernon Elementary School lost th…