In response to our post on Friday regarding Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s position on the offshore wind farm at Cape Cod, The Energy Blog had this to say:
Technorati tags: Energy, Electricity, Environment, Cape Cod, Wind Power, New England, Riverkeeper, NIMBY
I don't think that Kennedy is necessarily typical of environmentalists, but he certainly does nothing positive for their image.Those last two sentences sound a lot like what we wrote last month:
I do believe that global warming is an urgent environmental concern and believe it cannot be solved with renewable energy alone and that both clean coal technologies with sequestration and nuclear power have a role to play in solving this problem in the short term. There is probably not enough time for either renewable energy or conservation to halt or reverse the effects of global warming before it may cause irreversible damage. Therefore we must take all possible steps to mitigate global warming. Deploying nuclear energy and clean coal technologies does not mean that any efforts should be spared in pursuing renewable energy or conservation. In fact efforts in these areas should be accelerated as much as possible.
Saying that the world has to decide between nuclear energy or renewables is a false choice. The fact of the matter remains that future energy demand will rise so much, that there will be more than enough room for nuclear energy and renewables in the marketplace. It's just that over the next few decades, we're going to need baseload power generation, and right now, the only technology that can provide that baseload power is nuclear energy.Looks like there's more agreement on this issue than some folks might realize.
Technorati tags: Energy, Electricity, Environment, Cape Cod, Wind Power, New England, Riverkeeper, NIMBY
Comments