Skip to main content

Ignoring The Facts on Indian Point

A few days ago, I mentioned that many of the folks who had been more vocal about closing the nuclear reactors at Indian Point Energy Center had disappeared from the public square in the wake of the power outage gripping parts of New York City.

It looks like I spoke too soon. From the New York Sun:
And the winner of this week's gubernatorial debate between Democrats Eliot Spitzer and Thomas Suozzi was … Republican John Faso. Both Messrs. Spitzer and Suozzi said they'd close the Indian Point nuclear power plant in Westchester County, this after a week of 95 degree heat that left tens of thousands of Queens residents without power. The nuclear plant provides 2,000 megawatts of electricity, or about 11% of the state's supply, without supporting Middle East oil potentates or creating the pollution generated by burning coal.

After watching the debate, we rang Mr. Faso and asked him about Indian Point. "It's amazing that they would have answered the question that way," he said of the Democrats. "We need more generating capacity, not less." Mr. Faso noted that closing Indian Point would mean that businesses would close for lack of electricity. "Air conditioning wouldn't work," Mr. Faso said.
Thanks to Urban Elephants and News Copy New York for the pointer.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Kirk Sorensen said…
It seems as though Mr. Spitzer doesn't want the facts to get in the way of a useful opinion. That is an error each of us should watch for in ourselves as well.
Dr. Gonzo said…
Just a bit of info. I have been compiling a list of declared "nuclear emergencies" from the NRC's Event Notification Reports for a while now on my blog.

This was largely in response to Rory Kennedy's documentary on Indian Point, which I found biased and incomplete. I wanted to find out for myself what the facts were.

What I have found out about Indian Point isn't all that scary, at least no more so than any other nuclear plant.

From 2000-2005 Indian Point experienced three "Unusual Events" and one "Alert." There are eight other U.S. nuclear plants that had three Unusual Events during that time period and eleven plants that had four or more unusual events during the same period.

As for the alert, which is the second classification of nuclear emergency according to the NRC, there were nine other plants besides Indian Point which experienced the issuance of at least one alert and three plants had two alerts; again between 2000-2005.

In fact, of the 65 nuclear power sites in the U.S. only thirteen experienced no issuance of a nuclear emergency classification.

I think this shows that the threats are often overblown and the benefits outweigh the cons. Nuclear power offers the most viable solution to our energy woes at the moment. It's either that or global warming, take your pick.

You can check out the rest of my nuclear info at: http://fromthegonzo.wordpress.com/nuclear/
don kosloff said…
I have never seen any evidence that Mr. Spitzer has any interest in using facts to influence his putative public policies.

It is amazing that New York state currently gets more than 10 percent of its electricity by burning oil.

Popular posts from this blog

Sneak Peek

There's an invisible force powering and propelling our way of life.
It's all around us. You can't feel it. Smell it. Or taste it.
But it's there all the same. And if you look close enough, you can see all the amazing and wondrous things it does.
It not only powers our cities and towns.
And all the high-tech things we love.
It gives us the power to invent.
To explore.
To discover.
To create advanced technologies.
This invisible force creates jobs out of thin air.
It adds billions to our economy.
It's on even when we're not.
And stays on no matter what Mother Nature throws at it.
This invisible force takes us to the outer reaches of outer space.
And to the very depths of our oceans.
It brings us together. And it makes us better.
And most importantly, it has the power to do all this in our lifetime while barely leaving a trace.
Some people might say it's kind of unbelievable.
They wonder, what is this new power that does all these extraordinary things?

A Design Team Pictures the Future of Nuclear Energy

For more than 100 years, the shape and location of human settlements has been defined in large part by energy and water. Cities grew up near natural resources like hydropower, and near water for agricultural, industrial and household use.

So what would the world look like with a new generation of small nuclear reactors that could provide abundant, clean energy for electricity, water pumping and desalination and industrial processes?

Hard to say with precision, but Third Way, the non-partisan think tank, asked the design team at the Washington, D.C. office of Gensler & Associates, an architecture and interior design firm that specializes in sustainable projects like a complex that houses the NFL’s Dallas Cowboys. The talented designers saw a blooming desert and a cozy arctic village, an old urban mill re-purposed as an energy producer, a data center that integrates solar panels on its sprawling flat roofs, a naval base and a humming transit hub.

In the converted mill, high temperat…

Seeing the Light on Nuclear Energy

If you think that there is plenty of electricity, that the air is clean enough and that nuclear power is a just one among many options for meeting human needs, then you are probably over-focused on the United States or Western Europe. Even then, you’d be wrong.

That’s the idea at the heart of a new book, “Seeing the Light: The Case for Nuclear Power in the 21st Century,” by Scott L. Montgomery, a geoscientist and energy expert, and Thomas Graham Jr., a retired ambassador and arms control expert.


Billions of people live in energy poverty, they write, and even those who don’t, those who live in places where there is always an electric outlet or a light switch handy, we need to unmake the last 200 years of energy history, and move to non-carbon sources. Energy is integral to our lives but the authors cite a World Health Organization estimate that more than 6.5 million people die each year from air pollution.  In addition, they say, the global climate is heading for ruinous instability. E…