Natural Gas Notes: R.W. Beck Projects 15% Price Cut

Energy Consultants R.W. Beck have cut their 2006 natural gas price forecast by 15%. From a company press release:

The latest natural gas market analysis from management consulting and engineering firm R. W. Beck, Inc. supports a reduction to its calendar 2006 forecast Henry Hub price - bringing it to $7.60 per MMBtu.

The new price deck is $1.40 lower than the $9 per MMBtu price R. W. Beck predicted during the first two quarters of 2006. The decrease stems primarily from January's mild weather, which led to lower prices during the second quarter.

"Taking into account the current storage overhang, with normal injections for the rest of the summer, we are projecting a November 1 inventory of 3.55 Tcf, only 0.25 Tcf higher than the previous high recorded in 2004," says Catherine Elder, leader of R. W. Beck's Natural Gas & Fuels practice in Sacramento. "We, therefore, don't think prices will go much lower, absent an extraordinarily mild summer or lower oil prices," she says.

Elder adds, however, that unresolved world tensions may lead R. W. Beck to maintain the assumption of oil at $65 per barrel into 2007. Doing so would increase the 2007 forecast natural gas price from $7.20 to $7.79.

The latest forecast is available for download.

Turkey, which recently made noises about wanting to build three nuclear power plants (possibly with Russian assistance), is apparently facing a series of blackouts and brownouts thanks to higher natural gas prices.

And finally, via Megawatt Daily (subscription required), a Merrill Lynch report projected that electricity demand growth will outstrip capacity additions in the U.S. by more than 31,000 MW through 2010. As a result, more natural gas-fired capacity could be pressed into service as peaking capacity as a "stop-gap measure."

Technorati tags: Energy, Technology, Electricity, Natural Gas, Turkey

Comments

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog