Skip to main content

The U.S. Nuclear Renaissance: Forgings Now!

On Tuesday, I wrote about a nuclear fabrication shop in Indiana. Today, there was an equally exciting press release from UniStar Nuclear:
UniStar Companies First to Procure Components for First Potential Nuclear Power Plant in Nearly Three Decades

Constellation Energy ... and AREVA today announced that through their jointly developed UniStar business model they have entered into agreements to procure the long lead materials necessary to construct the first potential U.S. nuclear power plant of a planned U.S EPR fleet. Of the several U.S. companies considering the construction of new nuclear plants, Constellation Energy and AREVA, through the UniStar business model, are the first to procure the necessary raw materials.

This procurement includes 44 heavy forgings for a planned U.S. Evolutionary Power Reactor (EPR) to be supplied by AREVA. The forgings - needed for the reactor pressure vessel and steam generators - will be produced at international facilities. The completed forgings will be manufactured into final components at BWX Technologies' (BWXT) facility in Mount Vernon, Ind., or AREVA's facility in Chalon-St. Marcel.
(My guess is that the "international facilities" that will produce the forgings are at Japan Steel Works.)

My initial reaction this news was that these guys have a lot of guts. After all, they don't have an early site permit, and the design certification papers for the EPR have not been submitted to the NRC yet. One of my coworkers noted, however, that it might not be as big a risk as you would think. After all, there is an EPR under construction in Finland, and one is in the works for France. If nuclear licensing proves too cumbersome in the U.S., UniStar can probably sell the forgings in Europe, maybe even at a profit. A standardized design and a global market can be handy.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments

pgunter said…
It is becoming ever more obvious that this so-called "renaissance" is more part ruse than part pipe dream. An agreement to forge materials that can be used in other industries demonstrates little more than that.
David Bradish said…
Call it what you will. You're going to see many more utilities ordering parts way in advance over the next few years.
KenG said…
A minor clarification. These forgings could be used in "other countries" not "other industries". These would still be uniquely nuclear components and do represent an investment in the future of the nuclear industry.
pgunter said…
In fact, new designs are proposed with the use of less "nuclear grade" parts for a host of safety systems and instead rely upon "commercial grade" parts.

That means less quality control and assurance. This all comes out as the "solution" to the nuclear industry's decades old problem of substand and counterfeit parts for safety related systems and components.

A not so minor point and trade off of safety for cost.
Safety does not equal reliability.

The current 90%+ capacity factors are a problem, not an advantage, because no power plant reasonably needs more than about 75%. These designs rely not on the parts being reliable, but on the laws of physics. Using commercial-grade components will reduce costs, and that's it.

Unless, Mr. Gunter, little green aliens come down from the planet Zorkon with an anti-gravity beam. Would you like that to be a design-basis accident?
Furthermore, what's so magical about a steam system that happens to be connected to a nuclear heat source? Or, for that matter, an electrical system that happens to be at a nuclear power plant? They're steam systems and electrical systems, nothing more, and need nothing special--especially given these plants' passive safety.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …