Skip to main content

Yucca Mountain and Used Fuel Roundup

Yesterday's hearing before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on the Yucca Mountain Project has generated considerable coverage. Today, I'll be providing links to many of the relevant pieces, and also include other news on used fuel storage I've found in papers around the country.

Here's a good summary of yesterday's hearing from the AP:
A Senate committee chairman says the Bush administration's new timeline for opening the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste dump in Nevada in 2017 ignores the possibility of lawsuits and delays.

"Experience has shown that the schedule for Yucca is a slippery thing," Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., told the project's new director Thursday.

"My concern is that the new timetable does not include any margin for any further project delays by the (Energy Department), its contractors, or legal action by the state of Nevada all of which would cause DOE to miss these new deadlines," Domenici said at a hearing of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

[...]

The administration wants to lift the 77,000-ton storage cap on the dump 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas and allow as much waste as the mountain can safely hold - 132,000 tons or more.

If legislation making that change doesn't pass, "we will need a second repository in this country," Sproat said.
In April, EPRI issued a report that concluded that Yucca could up to nine times its current design capacity.

Back to the AP story:
Domenici said the solution also includes a new administration initiative to recycle nuclear waste, and an interim storage plan he's proposed.

Even if Yucca Mountain opens in 2017 it will take until 2040 to move the nuclear waste already accumulated into the dump, Domenici said.

"For those who don't think we need to address temporary storage: if everything goes perfectly, it will take over 30 years - longer than I have been in the Senate - to eliminate the existing backlog of spent fuel," said Domenici, elected in 1972.

Sproat has expressed doubts about the interim storage plan, saying it could take nearly as long to set it up as it would to begin moving waste to Yucca Mountain.
Through the Rutland Herald we learned that the Coalition of Northeast Governors have sent a letter to Senator Pete Domenici stating their opposition to language in the Senate Energy and Water Appropriations Bill that makes provisions for interim storage of used nuclear fuel across the country. Click here for a copy of the letter. For some other regional looks at how the issue is playing out across the country, click here for a story from the Decatur Daily and here for a report on local approval for above-ground dry cask storage at the Limerick Nuclear Power Plant in Pennsylvania.

UPDATE: Testimony from Senator Harry Reid, Senator John Ensign and Geoff Fettus from NRDC are now available at the Senate Energy Web site.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Making Clouds for a Living

Donell Banks works at Southern Nuclear’s Plant Vogtle units 3 and 4 as a shift supervisor in Operations, but is in the process of transitioning to his newly appointed role as the daily work controls manager. He has been in the nuclear energy industry for about 11 years.

I love what I do because I have the unique opportunity to help shape the direction and influence the culture for the future of nuclear power in the United States. Every single day presents a new challenge, but I wouldn't have it any other way. As a shift supervisor, I was primarily responsible for managing the development of procedures and programs to support operation of the first new nuclear units in the United States in more than 30 years. As the daily work controls manager, I will be responsible for oversight of the execution and scheduling of daily work to ensure organizational readiness to operate the new units.

I envision a nuclear energy industry that leverages the technology of today to improve efficiency…

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear: Energy for All Political Seasons

The electoral college will soon confirm a surprise election result, Donald Trump. However, in the electricity world, there are fewer surprises – physics and economics will continue to apply, and Republicans and Democrats are going to find a lot to like about nuclear energy over the next four years.

In a Trump administration, the carbon conversation is going to be less prominent. But the nuclear value proposition is still there. We bring steady jobs to rural areas, including in the Rust Belt, which put Donald Trump in office. Nuclear plants keep the surrounding communities vibrant.

We hold down electricity costs for the whole economy. We provide energy diversity, reducing the risk of disruption. We are a critical part of America’s industrial infrastructure, and the importance of infrastructure is something that President-Elect Trump has stressed.

One of our infrastructure challenges is natural gas pipelines, which have gotten more congested as extremely low gas prices have pulled m…