Australian Mayor Says Yes to Nuclear Energy

Last week, we told you about a pair of professors who were backing new nuclear build in their hometown in Queensland. Now we're getting news of a local mayor who's openly backing new nuclear build as well:

MOUNT Isa Mayor Ron McCullough has backed the use of nuclear power, saying it could save the planet from the damage being done by burning coal.

He has also questioned the long-term future of energy alternatives such as gas being pushed by leaders in Townsville.

[...]

McCullough said he was `100 per cent' behind uranium mining and the use of uranium in nuclear power stations.

He said he had taken the argument for nuclear power to the Labor Party at Mount Isa 10 to 15 years ago 'long before they were talking about uranium mining out here'.

"I would be happy to discuss (a nuclear power plant) with anybody who wants to put it here," he said, adding that could be an appropriate geologically sound site 50km or 100km from the city.

Meanwhile, the dispute between the federal government and Western Australia over that state's uranium mining ban is heating up.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power, Electricity, Environment, Energy, Politics, Technology, Economics, Australia, Queensland, Mount Isa

Comments

Anonymous said…

Interesting, but largely symbolic.

Mount Isa is a town of 20,000 people, more than 1,000 miles away from Brisbane, the nearest large city. They're not on the east coast grid.

Furthermore, they're on a natural gas pipeline.

If Rod Adams or somebody else could get a small nuclear reactor on the market, that might be a goer (in fact, there are a *lot* of places in remote Australia that could potentially be powered by such a system and some - though not Mount Isa - would be prepared to pay well above typical grid rates), but there's no way in the world you'd be plonking an AP1000 in Mount Isa.

With regards to uranium mining, the thing to watch for is the Australian Labor Party's (the party that controls all six state legislatures, and is opposed to new uranium mines) annual conference in late April. There is likely to be a rather heated debate on the topic then.

If they don't change their policy, the federal government will likely try and override the ban, which will probably bring on another battle in the High Court of Australia to decide whether the federal government has the power to do so.

January 9, 2007 at 7:24 PM

Anonymous said…

The Australian Labor party is owned by the coal industry. They will never support nuclear energy as it is a direct competitor to coal.

January 10, 2007 at 9:09 AM

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog