Skip to main content

Australian Mayor Says Yes to Nuclear Energy

Last week, we told you about a pair of professors who were backing new nuclear build in their hometown in Queensland. Now we're getting news of a local mayor who's openly backing new nuclear build as well:
MOUNT Isa Mayor Ron McCullough has backed the use of nuclear power, saying it could save the planet from the damage being done by burning coal.

He has also questioned the long-term future of energy alternatives such as gas being pushed by leaders in Townsville.

[...]

McCullough said he was `100 per cent' behind uranium mining and the use of uranium in nuclear power stations.

He said he had taken the argument for nuclear power to the Labor Party at Mount Isa 10 to 15 years ago 'long before they were talking about uranium mining out here'.

"I would be happy to discuss (a nuclear power plant) with anybody who wants to put it here," he said, adding that could be an appropriate geologically sound site 50km or 100km from the city.
Meanwhile, the dispute between the federal government and Western Australia over that state's uranium mining ban is heating up.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Anonymous said…
Interesting, but largely symbolic.

Mount Isa is a town of 20,000 people, more than 1,000 miles away from Brisbane, the nearest large city. They're not on the east coast grid.

Furthermore, they're on a natural gas pipeline.

If Rod Adams or somebody else could get a small nuclear reactor on the market, that might be a goer (in fact, there are a *lot* of places in remote Australia that could potentially be powered by such a system and some - though not Mount Isa - would be prepared to pay well above typical grid rates), but there's no way in the world you'd be plonking an AP1000 in Mount Isa.

With regards to uranium mining, the thing to watch for is the Australian Labor Party's (the party that controls all six state legislatures, and is opposed to new uranium mines) annual conference in late April. There is likely to be a rather heated debate on the topic then.

If they don't change their policy, the federal government will likely try and override the ban, which will probably bring on another battle in the High Court of Australia to decide whether the federal government has the power to do so.
Anonymous said…
The Australian Labor party is owned by the coal industry. They will never support nuclear energy as it is a direct competitor to coal.

Popular posts from this blog

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Why Ex-Im Bank Board Nominations Will Turn the Page on a Dysfunctional Chapter in Washington

In our present era of political discord, could Washington agree to support an agency that creates thousands of American jobs by enabling U.S. companies of all sizes to compete in foreign markets? What if that agency generated nearly billions of dollars more in revenue than the cost of its operations and returned that money – $7 billion over the past two decades – to U.S. taxpayers? In fact, that agency, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), was reauthorized by a large majority of Congress in 2015. To be sure, the matter was not without controversy. A bipartisan House coalition resorted to a rarely-used parliamentary maneuver in order to force a vote. But when Congress voted, Ex-Im Bank won a supermajority in the House and a large majority in the Senate. For almost two years, however, Ex-Im Bank has been unable to function fully because a single Senate committee chairman prevented the confirmation of nominees to its Board of Directors. Without a quorum

NEI Praises Connecticut Action in Support of Nuclear Energy

Earlier this week, Connecticut Gov. Dannel P. Malloy signed SB-1501 into law, legislation that puts nuclear energy on an equal footing with other non-emitting sources of energy in the state’s electricity marketplace. “Gov. Malloy and the state legislature deserve praise for their decision to support Dominion’s Millstone Power Station and the 1,500 Connecticut residents who work there," said NEI President and CEO Maria Korsnick. "By opening the door to Millstone having equal access to auctions open to other non-emitting sources of electricity, the state will help preserve $1.5 billion in economic activity, grid resiliency and reliability, and clean air that all residents of the state can enjoy," Korsnick said. Millstone Power Station Korsnick continued, "Connecticut is the third state to re-balance its electricity marketplace, joining New York and Illinois, which took their own legislative paths to preserving nuclear power plants in 2016. Now attention should