Skip to main content

Australian Mayor Says Yes to Nuclear Energy

By Eric McErlain
Last week, we told you about a pair of professors who were backing new nuclear build in their hometown in Queensland. Now we're getting news of a local mayor who's openly backing new nuclear build as well:
MOUNT Isa Mayor Ron McCullough has backed the use of nuclear power, saying it could save the planet from the damage being done by burning coal.

He has also questioned the long-term future of energy alternatives such as gas being pushed by leaders in Townsville.

[...]

McCullough said he was `100 per cent' behind uranium mining and the use of uranium in nuclear power stations.

He said he had taken the argument for nuclear power to the Labor Party at Mount Isa 10 to 15 years ago 'long before they were talking about uranium mining out here'.

"I would be happy to discuss (a nuclear power plant) with anybody who wants to put it here," he said, adding that could be an appropriate geologically sound site 50km or 100km from the city.
Meanwhile, the dispute between the federal government and Western Australia over that state's uranium mining ban is heating up.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Anonymous said…
Interesting, but largely symbolic.

Mount Isa is a town of 20,000 people, more than 1,000 miles away from Brisbane, the nearest large city. They're not on the east coast grid.

Furthermore, they're on a natural gas pipeline.

If Rod Adams or somebody else could get a small nuclear reactor on the market, that might be a goer (in fact, there are a *lot* of places in remote Australia that could potentially be powered by such a system and some - though not Mount Isa - would be prepared to pay well above typical grid rates), but there's no way in the world you'd be plonking an AP1000 in Mount Isa.

With regards to uranium mining, the thing to watch for is the Australian Labor Party's (the party that controls all six state legislatures, and is opposed to new uranium mines) annual conference in late April. There is likely to be a rather heated debate on the topic then.

If they don't change their policy, the federal government will likely try and override the ban, which will probably bring on another battle in the High Court of Australia to decide whether the federal government has the power to do so.
January 9, 2007 at 7:24 PM
Anonymous said…
The Australian Labor party is owned by the coal industry. They will never support nuclear energy as it is a direct competitor to coal.
January 10, 2007 at 9:09 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

By
You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...
1 comment
Read more

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

By
Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...
Post a Comment
Read more